RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
 

That is an incredibly pathetic and false and misleading claim. I have provided information from Miss. Ark. tex. and Mich to support my position,while you have presented pics of dead horses. If you can't handle the truth please do yourself a favor and use the ignore feature. you will be doing yourself and the other members of the MB a huge favor.

RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
 

RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
 

Maybe Bluebird, you can post a pic of leading a stubborn ol horse to water and he just won't drink.:D

RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
 

Pathetic is the article you cited for this thread.

RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
 

But your only rebuttal was to post pics of dead horses. it doesn't get much more pathetic than that ,but I am sure you will try .

RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
 

I rest my case.

RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
 

You didn't present a case ,you simply posted and insult which you can't support with facts.

RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
 

When you watch it come out of the bull, your weyes tell you it's brown and your nose tells you stinks, no further evidence is required! You're looking at BS.


The entire premise of, and evidence presented for this thread surely stinks. Most especially thatNewsweek articleand we saw it come from the Bluebull.

SO.......

RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
 

Just more insults from someone that is so misinformed he didn't even understand what Kroll said about ARs in Miss.

I find it funny that Kroll couldn't even come close to explaining why 1.5 spikes have a much slower rate of antler development ,but maybe the Newsweek article provided the answer. killing the best specimens of any species is highly likely to have a long term negative effect.

RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
 

Yeah yeah, we know, Dr Kroll doesn't understand, Dr Kroll is biased, you don't need any credentials or training to know better thana guy with a PHD in wildlife biology.

Your immense talents as a hunter and vast knowledge of the whitetail deer are enough and we should accept what you say just cause you say so.

We know you don't need any sheepskin and how dare we question your conclusions, after all your extensive knowledge of the whitetail deer led to three whole deer sightings in 10 days of hunting.

I guess you da man after all