|
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
i hunt in the 3 point area and every year there is a forkhorn or 2 running around maybe a
a basket rack the next year they are bigger in body and rack in my woods we have killed 7 nice buck in last 3 years were as before ar they were far and few between but all those little buck got shot. IN my little woods there are more buck now the down side there are less doe thats why we quit shooting doe for a year or more that will depend on fawns and doe sighting in my woods |
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
Talked yourself into a circle there Blueboy. Just a little while back you claimed the people who were seeing more bucks were merely seeing small inferior bucks saved by AR Talked yourself into a circle there Blueboy. Just a little while back you claimed the people who were seeing more bucks were merely seeing small inferior bucks saved by AR That is because I agree that eliminating trophy hunting is not an urgent issue .most species will survive in spite of trophy hunting, it is just that the trophies will be smaller and the species overall may be smaller. That was the point Harris made in the last paragraph of the article. The time scale is one reason that most wildlife departments managing hunting harvests simply count the heads each year and decide how many to let hunters bag without thinking about genes. The most popular method of regulating hunting—restricting legal game to males with a minimum antler size—results in populations overrun with females and inferior males, which is ultimately no service to hunters. "The hunters wish for animals with large antlers and large horns, and yet their actions are making that harder to achieve," says Richard Harris, a conservation biologist in Montana. As a hunter, Harris knows that the outcome of this trend will satisfy no one, the Teddy Roosevelts of the next generation least of all. |
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter Oh and I notice you had no answer when Jim pointed out the conclusions of the study that you and your anti hunting hero Lily Huang chose to leave out. I will give youcredit for brilliance in one area Blueboy, You have an uncanny ability to take little pieces of truth so that you can assemble a lie 
One look at them and you just know you want to.[:-] They make it look so easy for you tohave to do it.:eek: And there's certainly no reason to feel guilty about it when ya do ,do it.;) |
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
Blah,Blah , blah!! Let's change the subject again.
|
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
ORIGINAL: bluebird2 Blah,Blah , blah!! Let's change the subject again. blah,blah, blah is the smartest thing i have seen you say blue |
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
And its a lot more intelligent than anything you have ever posted. I can play the cheap shot game too, but I would prefer to discuss the issues.
So what is your answer for declining breeding rates? |
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
going by the study the was done by the university of misstaken
how do you prove the breeding rates are declining |
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
ORIGINAL: bluebird2 So what is your answer for declining breeding rates? |
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
Maybe we could enhance DMAP etc with aspecial "ugly doe" tag and run a special season before the rut?:D
Maybe if we put out some beer during the rut to help the does look "prettier" ;) Maybe we can get smilin Bob to donate some Enzyte to feed to the less "gifted" bucks?:D Maybe we could set up feeders with a McDonalds like playground for the fawns to give momma some time sneak off to be alone with dad?;) |
RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
The breeding rate decline is based on the PGC data contained in the Annual Wildlife Reports(AWRs). Haven't you seen it yet?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:58 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.