Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
01-05-2009, 05:16 PM
#81
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 8,167
RE: Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
ORIGINAL: bowtruck
that may explain some results if a wco gets in hurry or has a bad day or just wants results to look
diffrent
not trying to p in any wco`s cheerios
that may explain some results if a wco gets in hurry or has a bad day or just wants results to look
diffrent
not trying to p in any wco`s cheerios
Add that toa little moon lighting cash from stocking mountian lions and you can see how most W.C.O. spend the off season bone fishing in the islands.
01-05-2009, 05:30 PM
#83
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: 3c pa
Posts: 1,212
RE: Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
I am not saying their outlaws but i went salmon fishing in pulaski ny with a wco he was sidearming
even thou it not legal there a fish warden pulled him and 3 others aside for safe fishing awards
a wco can turn his head when he wants to
even thou it not legal there a fish warden pulled him and 3 others aside for safe fishing awards
a wco can turn his head when he wants to
01-05-2009, 05:34 PM
#84
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 8,167
RE: Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
That wasn't even close to being funny. But then again you have nothing else to contribute so I am the not least bit surprised.
That wasn't even close to being funny. But then again you have nothing else to contribute so I am the not least bit surprised.
There is that better?
01-05-2009, 05:57 PM
#85
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SW PA USA
Posts: 7,220
RE: Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
ORIGINAL: bawanajim
I'm sorry about that itwas my fault ,I forgot to add the little
There is that better?
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
That wasn't even close to being funny. But then again you have nothing else to contribute so I am the not least bit surprised.
That wasn't even close to being funny. But then again you have nothing else to contribute so I am the not least bit surprised.
There is that better?
Remember, it's all in the delivery!
I still wouldn't quit my day job if I were you
01-05-2009, 06:07 PM
#86
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
RE: Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
ORIGINAL: bawanajim
I'm sorry about that it was my fault ,I forgot to add the little
There is that better?
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
That wasn't even close to being funny. But then again you have nothing else to contribute so I am the not least bit surprised.
That wasn't even close to being funny. But then again you have nothing else to contribute so I am the not least bit surprised.
There is that better?
01-05-2009, 06:18 PM
#87
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 8,167
RE: Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
No BJ, it is still nothing but mindless babbling.
ORIGINAL: bawanajim
I'm sorry about that itwas my fault ,I forgot to add the little
There is that better?
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
That wasn't even close to being funny. But then again you have nothing else to contribute so I am the not least bit surprised.
That wasn't even close to being funny. But then again you have nothing else to contribute so I am the not least bit surprised.
There is that better?
01-05-2009, 10:33 PM
#89
Typical Buck
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location:
Posts: 659
RE: Why is the PGC reintroducing Fishers?
ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter
Posts like that and this thread in general reflect the fact that a sad day has come for hunters in Pennsylvania.
Since I began hunting in the late 60's hunters have always been able to proudly declare that we were responsible for the recovery of many species over the years,both game and nongame. Threads like this and posts like the last one show that we have some among us that are simply so selfish that they can't be bothered caring about wildlife unless it's something they can shoot.
Make no mistake about it, The future of hunting is in the hands of people who do not hunt. For years, the general nonhunting public has hada positive and generally correct view that hunters care and support all wildlife. Posts like these do nothing more than help the PETA folks who would seek to destroy that positive image and they will benefit by pointing out the selfish hunters among us.
ORIGINAL: Screamin Steel
The fishers are part of the PGC's new FR (flock reduction) program. The turkeys are outcompeting all other bird species, so a 50% reduction is being pushed for by the Audubon and the tree huggers. Top it off with the new spur restictions, and we have a mirror image of the phenomenally successful deer program. Bonus hen tags in the spring and 1 1/4" minimum spur length should quickly and dramatically reduce the flock and provide the privileged few with a chance at a real trophy tom. Apparently fishers are very capable turkey killers, known to prey onadults as well as juvenilles, and are notorious nest raiders as well. Just what the PGC ordered. Should accomplish in quick order what the coyotes have already been doing to the turkeys and what they have done with the deer fawns as well.
The fishers are part of the PGC's new FR (flock reduction) program. The turkeys are outcompeting all other bird species, so a 50% reduction is being pushed for by the Audubon and the tree huggers. Top it off with the new spur restictions, and we have a mirror image of the phenomenally successful deer program. Bonus hen tags in the spring and 1 1/4" minimum spur length should quickly and dramatically reduce the flock and provide the privileged few with a chance at a real trophy tom. Apparently fishers are very capable turkey killers, known to prey onadults as well as juvenilles, and are notorious nest raiders as well. Just what the PGC ordered. Should accomplish in quick order what the coyotes have already been doing to the turkeys and what they have done with the deer fawns as well.
Posts like that and this thread in general reflect the fact that a sad day has come for hunters in Pennsylvania.
Since I began hunting in the late 60's hunters have always been able to proudly declare that we were responsible for the recovery of many species over the years,both game and nongame. Threads like this and posts like the last one show that we have some among us that are simply so selfish that they can't be bothered caring about wildlife unless it's something they can shoot.
Make no mistake about it, The future of hunting is in the hands of people who do not hunt. For years, the general nonhunting public has hada positive and generally correct view that hunters care and support all wildlife. Posts like these do nothing more than help the PETA folks who would seek to destroy that positive image and they will benefit by pointing out the selfish hunters among us.
If you couldn't see the satire and humor in my previous post, then I point it out to you now. But your post seems to be intended seriously, and I find it more ridicuous than my humorous one. Now that's irony.