![]() |
RE: PA deer Quizz
ORIGINAL: bluebird2 None of those observations are part of the criteria the PGC uses to determine herd health. Maybe you should submit that data to the PGC and see if they agree with your observations. |
RE: PA deer Quizz
But it has nothing to do with the health of the herd as defined by the PGC and that was the issue that was being discussed.
|
RE: PA deer Quizz
ORIGINAL: bluebird2 But it has nothing to do with the health of the herd as defined by the PGC and that was the issue that was being discussed. |
RE: PA deer Quizz
Bob, I'll take: "all would be relevant", for $200 [8D]
|
RE: PA deer Quizz
Bluebird really thinks he is a rock star. Karaoke anyone??:D:D
|
RE: PA deer Quizz
ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter ORIGINAL: bluebird2 But it has nothing to do with the health of the herd as defined by the PGC and that was the issue that was being discussed. |
RE: PA deer Quizz
All I know is that my hunting is by far and away the best its ever been, and 10 times better than I ever thought possible here in PA. To go from seeing a true big buck, once every few years to seeing a couple of them each season is amazing.
And I’m not talking about in season sightings where bb2 would spin it that I was just getting better as a hunter, I’m talking about riding around the same spotlighting loop for the past 22 years. Back in the day we’d spot 2-3x a week and like I said see maybe 1-2 decent bucks each year and a true big buck once every 2-3 years. Now we see decent 2 yr olds on a regular basis, and there are a few monsters around each year and I get out spotting maybe ¼ of the times I used too. |
RE: PA deer Quizz
ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter You mentioned herd health Do you notice that the deer look plump lately? I always check out other deer at my butcher's place. There are some real hogs lately, and not just the bucks either. Relevant? Will get spun as unhealthy probably, because the PA deer are now overweight and will all need Jenny Craig. [8D] |
RE: PA deer Quizz
Can you explain why the increased weights you have observed haven't translated into higher breeding rates of fawns and higher productivity of adult doe?
|
RE: PA deer Quizz
ORIGINAL: bluebird2 Can you explain why the increased weights you have observed haven't translated into higher breeding rates of fawns and higher productivity of adult doe? |
RE: PA deer Quizz
Do you think I or anyone else cares what you think ,since apparently all you are concerned about is bigger racks?
|
RE: PA deer Quizz
I believe that is no less honorable of a desire than to perpetuate the low quality, but guaranteed result, of a filled buck tag for one day a year hunters.
Life is easy when you have low expectations. Sounds similar to "trout" season. Which kind hunter works harder for conservation and the sport in general? |
RE: PA deer Quizz
I believe that is no less honorable of a desire than to perpetuate the low quality, but guaranteed result, of a filled buck tag for one day a year hunters. |
RE: PA deer Quizz
So you're saying the success rate hasn't changed all that much, per capita?
|
RE: PA deer Quizz
Per capita, the success rate has dropped significantly. According to the PGC, the buck harvest rate is the same now , as the 25 year average,whatever that means.
|
RE: PA deer Quizz
ORIGINAL: bluebird2 Do you think I or anyone else cares what you think ,since apparently all you are concerned about is bigger racks? Could you please provide the link to the post where I have claimed that all I'm concerned with are bigger racks? I don't think so............ |
RE: PA deer Quizz
A picture speaks louder than words, especially in this case. Thanks.
|
RE: PA deer Quizz
ORIGINAL: bluebird2 A picture speaks louder than words, especially in this case. Thanks. ![]() If you ever hope to have any credibility on this site, you might want to avoid posts like that one that expose your jealousy/ inferiority/low self esteem problems:D |
RE: PA deer Quizz
[quote]ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter ORIGINAL: bluebird2 A picture speaks louder than words, especially in this case. Thanks. ![]() If you ever hope to have any credibility on this site, you might want to avoid posts like that one that expose your jealousy/ inferiority/low self esteem problems:D I am rather surprised you would make that post considering your post accusing me of putting words in your mouth is what started this exchange It's always fun when someone gives you the opportunity to stuff their own words right back down their throat. Thats an opportunity I just cant let go, so: Could you please provide the link to the post where I have claimed that all I'm concerned with are bigger racks? I don't think so... I don't recall saying anything about being jealous of your bucks. I always enjoy seeing nice bucks and its always good to know some PA hunters have good deer hunting. |
RE: PA deer Quizz
ORIGINAL: bluebird2 Per capita, the success rate has dropped significantly. According to the PGC, the buck harvest rate is the same now , as the 25 year average,whatever that means. Being the same as the 25 year average would mean it is statistically insignificant. The success rate has not statistically changed much, per capita, though.Do you agree? |
RE: PA deer Quizz
The term,"per capita" includes the entire population of the state, not just hunters.
In 2000 we had 1,038,546 licensed hunters with a buck harvest of 203K for a success rate of 19.5%. In 2005 we had 964,158 hunters and harvested 120K buck for a success rate of 12.5%. So, not only did the success rate drop significantly, the unsuccessful hunters also saw a lot fewer bucks or didn't see any bucks . Also, due to HR and the concurrent season they also saw a lot fewer antlerless deer. |
RE: PA deer Quizz
In 2000 we had 1,038,546 licensed hunters with a buck harvest of 203K for a success rate of 19.5%. In 2005 we had 964,158 hunters and harvested 120K buck for a success rate of 12.5%. So, not only did the success rate drop significantly, the unsuccessful hunters also saw a lot fewer bucks or didn't see any bucks . Also, due to HR and the concurrent season they also saw a lot fewer antlerless deer. Ol Jimbob didn't get to shoot his forky this year....WAAAAHHHH the world is going to end. Maybe having tougher hunting will cause people to actually have to HUNT for deer. Not just stand in the woods and wait for one to walk by. |
RE: PA deer Quizz
Maybe having tougher hunting will cause people to actually have to HUNT for deer. Not just stand in the woods and wait for one to walk by Not just stand in the woods and wait for one to walk by |
RE: PA deer Quizz
Can you give us the success rate for bow hunters?
|
RE: PA deer Quizz
ORIGINAL: bluebird2 The term,"per capita" includes the entire population of the state, not just hunters. In 2000 we had 1,038,546 licensed hunters with a buck harvest of 203K for a success rate of 19.5%. In 2005 we had 964,158 hunters and harvested 120K buck for a success rate of 12.5%. So, not only did the success rate drop significantly, the unsuccessful hunters also saw a lot fewer bucks or didn't see any bucks . Also, due to HR and the concurrent season they also saw a lot fewer antlerless deer. Well, no. The term per capita is a Latin phrase meaning "per head" or for the more simple minded..."per hunter". When relating to per capita, the term would be applied only to parties of interest to the subject. You would not include golfers in the equation, as an example. Actually, your figures are skewed. The harvest in 2000 was before concurrent seasons. So anyone out hunting would not stop unless they hunted their allotment of usual days, or they shot a buck. In 2005 we had concurrent seasons where a certain percentage of hunters shot the first DEER that came along, and then were not permitted to harvest another that day. A high percentage of hunters do not return after the first day. There would then be a disproportionate number of hunters on subsequent days of the season, because there is more participation on day one than all that follow. You are comparing the proverbial apples and Oranges in your figures. |
RE: PA deer Quizz
Isn't that exactly what the vast majority of bow hunters do every year? I hope this clears up many of your misconceptions about archery hunting Bird.. |
RE: PA deer Quizz
Bluebird please don't misconstrue Dr. Demarais' teachings. There comes a point in time when antler restrictions do result in highgrading, but that is under relatively perfect conditions. Pennsylvania and New York are nowhere near those perfect conditions. The buck to doe ratio would have to be 3 to 1 or better, habitat & nutrition conditions pristine and several years of antler restrictions would have to have been in place to be at a highgrading level. Then and only then do you change the methodology of the management plan taking into account actual deer aging, antler mass andwidth and include culling as part of the harvesting plan (as they do in places like Texas).
|
RE: PA deer Quizz
It is more likely to get many more hunters to quit hunting ,which has been the trend under the current deer management plan. |
RE: PA deer Quizz
Let's take up a collection.
|
RE: PA deer Quizz
The buck to doe ratio would have to be 3 to 1 or better, habitat & nutrition conditions pristine and several years of antler restrictions would have to have been in place to be at a highgrading level. Then and only then do you change the methodology of the management plan taking into account actual deer aging, antler mass and width and include culling as part of the harvesting plan (as they do in places like Texas). Your post is quite interesting since I have never seen the criteria you posted associated with high grading. Can you provide a link to the sorce of that info? High grading occurred after just 4 years of ARs in Miss and it occurred across all soil types . When high grading occurred in Miss. the habitat was not pristine. Our B/D ratio in PA before ARs was 1:2 and the herd was at or below the MSY carrying capacity, so I suppose PA met your criteria for high grading. |
RE: PA deer Quizz
ORIGINAL: White-tail-deer Can you give us the success rate for bow hunters? |
RE: PA deer Quizz
Thanks!
|
RE: PA deer Quizz
n 2005 we had concurrent seasons where a certain percentage of hunters shot the first DEER that came along, and then were not permitted to harvest another that day. A high percentage of hunters do not return after the first day. There would then be a disproportionate number of hunters on subsequent days of the season, because there is more participation on day one than all that follow. You are comparing the proverbial apples and Oranges in your figures. |
RE: PA deer Quizz
ORIGINAL: bluebird2 ORIGINAL: White-tail-deer Can you give us the success rate for bow hunters? As for the bow, it propells its' projectile at roughly 175-300 fps. No practical telescopic sights are available, it relies on either hemmorage of pneumothorax to kill a deer so the taget kill zone is about half that of a rifle. It must be drawn and held in the presence of the game and it's effective range is less than 50 yards and realistically should be confined to shots of less than 30 in most cases. To anyone who has to ask the question you posed, I beleive Bill Engval has your answer..... HERE'S YOUR SIGN!!!! ![]() |
RE: PA deer Quizz
In 2000 the archery buck harvest success rate was 13.5% and in 2005 it was 11.8%. So over the same period the rifle buck harvest decreased by 7% the archery success rate only decreased by 1.7%. Now factor in the fact that archers like Livbucks only shoot 10 pts in archery and can still fill their buck tags the concurrent season, which group of hunters do you think has the advantage They spend considerably less time afield per success than bowhunters. Many rifle hunters' seasons can be measured in hours. |
RE: PA deer Quizz
While the facts you posted may be true , it still doesn't change the fact that in 2005 the success rate for archery buck hunters was 11.8% and the success rate for rifle hunters was 12.5%
In 2005,269K archers got to hunt for at least 120K legal buck ,while around 900K rifle hunters got to hunt for 90K legal buck. Rifle hunter had two weeks to harvest a buck while archers had at least 12 weeks. So which group had the advantage? |
RE: PA deer Quizz
In 2000 the archery buck harvest success rate was 13.5% and in 2005 it was 11.8%. So over the same period the rifle buck harvest decreased by 7% the archery success rate only decreased by 1.7%. Now factor in the fact that archers like Livbucks only shoot 10 pts in archery and can still fill their buck tags the concurrent season, which group of hunters do you think has the advantage? |
RE: PA deer Quizz
Bluebird, the reason Dr. Gary Alt chose the AR plan with extensive deer management permits was because the buck to doe ratio in Pennsylvania was so out of whack. Don't know where you got your number from, but it is incorrect. Do not portend to compare the habitat of Mississippi with northern states. To do so would be ignorant. Mississippi habitat has a much longer growing season and its soil is lush with the vitamins and nutrients that generate much better antler development. Therefore highgrading absolutely comes earlier down there. Not sure if you would consider this a link but Dr. Demarais and I discussed this a few weeks ago in Chattanooga , Tennessee at the QDMA convention.
(perhaps pristeen was a littleextreme as far a terminology but my point was that the habitat in Mississippi is a lot better then Pennsylvania or NY) |
RE: PA deer Quizz
In 2005,269K archers got to hunt for at least 120K legal buck ,while around 900K rifle hunters got to hunt for 90K legal buck. |
RE: PA deer Quizz
ORIGINAL: livbucks In 2000 the archery buck harvest success rate was 13.5% and in 2005 it was 11.8%. So over the same period the rifle buck harvest decreased by 7% the archery success rate only decreased by 1.7%. Now factor in the fact that archers like Livbucks only shoot 10 pts in archery and can still fill their buck tags the concurrent season, which group of hunters do you think has the advantage They spend considerably less time afield per success than bowhunters. Many rifle hunters' seasons can be measured in hours. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:54 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.