Yep, I see no political influence there.


Don't get me wrong I completely understand your support and defense of the operations and management of the PAGC............

Yup, I am completely off base, my most humble apologies to the ever failing DNR and their staff. I don't make much money either but that is not excuse to poorly perform my duties! Every working man is under paid and overworked if you ask them. I am tired of hearing the same sad story from our government.

You do realize they are morons don't you?Not referring to the commissioners of course.

Yup, I am simple. Does this sound like a description of the down to earth guy who cares about our wildlife?

Much worse than I thought, a lawyer. How about viewing some of the results of this wonderful commission before attempting to discredit others. Iguess by "they" Sylvan you are really referring to me since I am the only one quoted. Does eveyone in Upstate New York personally attack people for expressing their views or is it your personal lack of communication skills that force you to attack others because you do not have the means to depict your own views?

Relax a bit there chief.

Hello, kettle...meet pot....

I know many lawyers who are some of THE MOST educated, experienced sportsmen and women in the country. Not to boot, but the extra income they make is often dumped into charity works for kids and the outdoors.

In fact, I know a group of lawyers who are outdoors-enthusiasts who paid for and created a place for terminally-ill hunters, and children with disabilities. They have the necessary equipment that allows the less fortunate to hunt, and have full facilities that cater to specific needs (ie wheelchair box blinds that can lift, shooting aids, etc).

So before you open your mouth further complaining about people, don't lump them into a category.

Some people, regardless of where they're from, "personally attack people" simply because they wear a suit or have chosen politics as a profession. Imaintain thatit's moronic, not to mention offensive,to make such simple minded assumptions so if you want to place yourself with that group, i.e. the "they" i referred to, then be my guest.

Sorry fellas didn't realize there was a lawyer and a politican in the group.I guess not all terrorists are badeither? Have a heart feltstory about that? Have a problemwith freedom of speech or only when itisn't in line with your personal views?Thanks for presenting your views in an aggressive manner with personal attacksas to scold rather than express your view and possibly even teach or sharein a learning environment.

Well all knowing ones I am done with this post, enjoy your plottedsnappy revengeA$$ Clowns. Siemper Fi

How much influence do you think congress has over the sport of hunting when it comes to revenues and their cuts.....You think they don't have any say so of who the president is for the PGC?? You don't think they suggest recommendations on what to do to increase revenue or tell them how to???

The past has taught us not to trust lawyers and politics....= suits in this bussiness..
Lawyers are allways twisting the story to make it look like the truth when it is actually a lie....They make their money on lieing...Show me an honest lawyer and I will show you he is in poverty...98% ofLawyers and politics are all the same.... Liars and decietful to people... Do these top rank officials work for what we want, or for someone else agenda and a gain for them to climb the ladder or rub shoulders with higher ranks????

I myself rather be paying a true honest 100% sportsman to be head of PGC full time with no other job to be distracted by...His only job he would be allowed to hold was to look out for the sportsman interest while president of PGC..He wouldn't be allowed to be affiliated with any high rank officials in congress at all....The laws and bag limits would be voted on by the sportsmen not just a group of 10 to 100 people in rank...All the sportsmen who apply for hunting liscense would have a card to vote on doe season for their county every other year and sent in...I believe sportsmen would do this...This would be the most accurate way to detrmine the deer population...From the tens of thousands of hunters who are actually in the woods seeing the deer population for what it is in their county...For these so called high area of deer population areas...Give them a special lisense to harvest as many does as they want for an additional fee...When the heard comes in check...Get rid of that type of permit... This should be for all sportsmen to decide and vote on game laws in Pa. and not just a handful of people to decide what they want or think we want as sportsmens...

That's an insane proposal.Most hunters don't have the faintest clue about the relationship between the habitat and wildlife.Decisions about the wildlife should left to the wildlife professionals not the general public that expects hunting to be easy.

I went to the Surra,Hanna meeting about saving the deer and holding the PGC hostage.I couldn't believe the stupid ideas and remarks most of the people had to say.Almost all of them wanted the commissioners to be elected and not appointed.Even the brain-dead legislatures knew this was a stupid idea.What would prevent an anti-hunter to be elected as a commissioner.There was actually a group of hunters that wanted tosell off gamelands to fund the PGC.What a bunch of morons.