Well it's easy to say that"you only need to see as manydeer as you have tags to fill" but to me that BS. Granted I'm not a poacher and I don't kill more than I have tags for. But for me I don't like setting in my stand for countless hours not seeing deer. I don't have to kill everything that I see but I DO expect to see deer while on stand.

Im in Berkley county and hunt 2 different places, my own land which is in a large neighborhood ( everyone has 5 ac. + ) and at a freinds which adjoins Sleepy Creek. I cant say that I have noticed a huge change in the amount of deer that i see. My freind and I both manage to take relativley nice bucks each year at his place ( 6pt or better ) well except for me this year , but thats another story[:@]. I still saw 2 nice 8 pts out of the three times i went up there. Now at my place I can tell you there are more than 60 doe and they are all on my neighbors feeders every damn nite i can watch them from my stand [:@]any ways I do agree with the 1 buck per year but open up the doe limit.
Maybe like this :
1 buck - bow, rifle, or muzzle ( ANTLER RESTRICT : 6 OR BETTER )
3 doe- bow
3 doe- rifle
3 doe- muzzle

with out paying for extra tags, one price one option JMO

..whaddya wannabet I hunted your area BEFORE it was broken into lots?.......as I have most all Berkeley Co since the 60s....

anyone else heard anything abotut he 2 buck limit for next year?........

Doe limits should be set based on local deer populations. Even county-wide limits are a one-sized fits all that may not work in certain areas, be it too many or too few does than the habitat can support.