Promising buck harvest in PA?
#21
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
ORIGINAL: AJ52
dd - who are YOU to say that "ALL QDM managers manage"......
Who are all the QDM managers that woudn't(you said no QDM manager) manage the herd at 12 DPSM which produces antlered buck harvest of 2 PSM. How many QDM managers have you spoke with to make the statement "NO QDM manager" would.............
Who are are ALL the QDM managers you refer to and where and what did they say.
dd - who are YOU to say that "ALL QDM managers manage"......
Who are all the QDM managers that woudn't(you said no QDM manager) manage the herd at 12 DPSM which produces antlered buck harvest of 2 PSM. How many QDM managers have you spoke with to make the statement "NO QDM manager" would.............
Who are are ALL the QDM managers you refer to and where and what did they say.
Maybe yo would cre to provide a reference that shows that I am wrong.
#22
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 0
From: Slower Lower Delaware 1st State
dd,
When you state in a post(see p2) that No QDM manager would manage the herd at 12 DPSM that means NONE or ALL would not. It is an absolute statement with no possible variables.
When you state All QDM managers manage the herd at much higher OWDD than a state agency.... that means ALL managers would manage at a much higher OWDD.
Again - this is an absolute statement your making to all Hunters in this thread. You state it as a conclusion in response to a valid statement,comment and opinion made by another member. Why would this member or any other wish to make further comment or respond.
You have not produced one shread of evidence that proves this sort of absolution. ALL,NONE means just that.
(Websters New World Dictionary;ALL=every one of,any,
every thing,everyone. NONE=no one,not anyone,not any).
Again your statements have no basis for fact or even a valid opinion and therefore have no place in this thread or MB.
When you state in a post(see p2) that No QDM manager would manage the herd at 12 DPSM that means NONE or ALL would not. It is an absolute statement with no possible variables.
When you state All QDM managers manage the herd at much higher OWDD than a state agency.... that means ALL managers would manage at a much higher OWDD.
Again - this is an absolute statement your making to all Hunters in this thread. You state it as a conclusion in response to a valid statement,comment and opinion made by another member. Why would this member or any other wish to make further comment or respond.
You have not produced one shread of evidence that proves this sort of absolution. ALL,NONE means just that.
(Websters New World Dictionary;ALL=every one of,any,
every thing,everyone. NONE=no one,not anyone,not any).
Again your statements have no basis for fact or even a valid opinion and therefore have no place in this thread or MB.
#24
Maybe yo would cre to provide a reference that shows that I am wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I to would like to see some reference from the other side to prove ddear wrong , it is easy to blast someone but before you do make sure you know what you are talking about. SHOW US YOUR REFERENCE PLEASE.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I to would like to see some reference from the other side to prove ddear wrong , it is easy to blast someone but before you do make sure you know what you are talking about. SHOW US YOUR REFERENCE PLEASE.
#25
Typical Buck
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
From: Altoona,PA
i would like to see the other side also
ORIGINAL: lost horn
Maybe yo would cre to provide a reference that shows that I am wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I to would like to see some reference from the other side to prove ddear wrong , it is easy to blast someone but before you do make sure you know what you are talking about. SHOW US YOUR REFERENCE PLEASE.
Maybe yo would cre to provide a reference that shows that I am wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I to would like to see some reference from the other side to prove ddear wrong , it is easy to blast someone but before you do make sure you know what you are talking about. SHOW US YOUR REFERENCE PLEASE.
#27
AJ52, thanks, well said.
All I'm saying is that there seems to be quite a few large racked deer for this early in the season. Now, I hunt ground and am surounded by thousands of acres of state corrections land that was never really affected by any of the game commissions changes. But we are seeing better than average deer this season for some reason. We typically see a few 150 class animals through late summer, but I'm wondering what a couple of these guys would score by October.
Ddear, don't you have anything better to do other than hijack threads?

All I'm saying is that there seems to be quite a few large racked deer for this early in the season. Now, I hunt ground and am surounded by thousands of acres of state corrections land that was never really affected by any of the game commissions changes. But we are seeing better than average deer this season for some reason. We typically see a few 150 class animals through late summer, but I'm wondering what a couple of these guys would score by October.
Ddear, don't you have anything better to do other than hijack threads?
#30
Those are some nice buck!! We have been seeing some nice buck in 5B as well! Looks like it's going to be a great year!! I was worried when we shot 4 nice buck last year off our property, but with the buck we are seeing there should be plenty to go around this year.


