BURRIS OR LEUPOLD?
#1
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Ladson SC
I'm getting ready to purchase a scope to go on my RSRH. I've been looking at a Burris 2-7x32mm and a Leupold 2.5-8x32mm in the cabelas catalog and can't decide which to get. Any suggestions on which is the better scope or any other recommendations?
#2
Typical Buck
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins, Colorado
Not sure about either one, but....I've heard leupolds customer service is second to none. I've heard of them replacing scopes/binos even when they are a few years old. Even on minor problems. FYI
Jay
Jay
#8
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,471
Likes: 0
From:
YOu must be talking about the 2.5-8x36 VXIII scope. I would go with Leupold as their Customer SErvice is well worth it. The scope optically is a better scope then the Burris as well. If you don't want to spend that much money look at a VX-II 2-7 they have the same lenses as the Vari-x III model and should rate in the low 90's as far as light transmittal.
#10
Leupold all the way.Leopold has a nice M8 ERR2x 20mm scope for around 220.00 in the Silver finish.I have it mounted on a new Ruger SBH Hunter. It's still unfired so I can't tell of it performance. I like the Leupolds.I'm sure this one will be like all the others I have First Class. I was going to buy the 4 x but was advised by many to go with the 2x instead for whatever that's worth.
Ruger Redhawk
Ruger Redhawk



BURRIS[:'(] ive had to deal with them and it was not fun or funny[:@]