Nikon 440 vs. Leupold RX II
 

Hey everyone. First post and great website. I was wondering what yall thought was the better of the two rangefinders. I can get them for about the same price. I will be using them for deer and coyote hunting with bow and gun. Also I know the nikon ranges deer and such at 437 yards. But what about the Leupold. It says 750 but is that reflective or not? Thanks alot

RE: Nikon 440 vs. Leupold RX II
 

The furthest I've gotten my RXII to range is 476 yards. But that was at a large bridge peer over the river. I doubt it would work that far on a deer. The range is misleading but I wouldn't take a shot from that distance anyways. I found my RXII on ebay for 234 NIB shipped so I couldn't pass it up.

RE: Nikon 440 vs. Leupold RX II
 

I had the Leupold RX II for a while but switched to the Nikon 440. I like the nikon because it had a little quicker response time and also thought it was more field friendly. (smaller and fits in hand better). both are nice though, I really don't think you could go wrong with either.

RE: Nikon 440 vs. Leupold RX II
 

I also went with the Nikon 440 as well a couple of years ago. Very well made unit for the money!! Also, who really needs a laser rangefinder rated for over 440 yards anyway???[:-]

RE: Nikon 440 vs. Leupold RX II
 

AGREE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!