Tricks for accuracy on a Rem 700?
#12
Ive owned 3 700s and they all shot great w/out bedding or floating anything. All Ive ever done is adjust the trigger. I currently have a 700mt rifle w/ a thin barrel ,that will shoot 1'' groups or less, and put 5 shots in a paper plate at 200yds just resting the forend. I did put a rifle basix trigger in it, but the older factory ones can be easily adjusted.
http://www.quarterbore.com/library/a...00trigger.html
http://www.quarterbore.com/library/a...00trigger.html
#13
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: S.W. Pa.-- Heart in North Central Pa. mountains-
Posts: 2,600
There's a great reference on this subject out "there". It's called "Accurizing The Factory Gun".... by M.L. McPherson, published by Precision Shooting, Inc. It deals with the what's, why's, and how's of it all. If you're serious about tinkering, it's worth your time. Lots of real good stuff there. Y'all go git one, y'hear?
#14
I have a Remington 700 BDL-LH in .270 that I have owned since about 1976. Very early I had it glass bedded, barrel free-floated, and trigger adjusted to 2 lb. I handload practically all my ammo, but it shoots practically everything I have ever fed it into 1-1 1/2 in. groups at 100 yards. All I have to do is adjust my scope or allow for different point of impact of various loads. I couldn't ask for a greater degree of accuracy in a gun that I can use for anything from ground hogs to elk. As far as I am concerned, no custom rifle could serve me any better.
#15
the dollar bill thing isnt enough in most cases. about 2 years ago i was able to watch some testing being conducted on barrel harmonics and some interesting things came up in the slow motion video. to make a long story short, barrels vibrate ALOT more then most think and for thinner contoured barrels 1/16 to 1/8 clearance is needed depending on the caliber. and supporting the barrel does reduce the distance in the nodes of the vibration wave but it will increase the frequency so there is a chance that a load that might have worked in your gun might not be the most accurate anymore
#18
Typical Buck
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 797
I believe in the reloading bench first then the tinkering. But I'll have to agree most problems start with a stiff trigger. If your pulling enough there's no way your gonna have consistant groups. Trigger job first.
One time at Honady camp.... lol
We were told by a hornady ammo tester if any given random box pulled out of a lot shot 3" groups or under that lot was considered good to go. That was years apon years ago. Hopefully standards have changed which I know they have. But sometimes I'm curious of how the tolerances of Rifle and Ammunition manufactors stick to those guidelines. And with today's riflemen expecting the very best they should be coming off the shelf with top notch degree of quality. Savage you have come along ways lil brother Kudo's to you. Step up or go out of business should be the motto. I'd rather pay another 500 bucks for a great rifle than know I'm gonna spend 1000 bucks making it shoot.
One time at Honady camp.... lol
We were told by a hornady ammo tester if any given random box pulled out of a lot shot 3" groups or under that lot was considered good to go. That was years apon years ago. Hopefully standards have changed which I know they have. But sometimes I'm curious of how the tolerances of Rifle and Ammunition manufactors stick to those guidelines. And with today's riflemen expecting the very best they should be coming off the shelf with top notch degree of quality. Savage you have come along ways lil brother Kudo's to you. Step up or go out of business should be the motto. I'd rather pay another 500 bucks for a great rifle than know I'm gonna spend 1000 bucks making it shoot.
#19
I surprised that nobody has blamed the person pulling the trigger, I've handed my benchrifle to my buddy and watched him print a 4" group with a gun that shoot's .100" 5 shot groups.
I've watched guys sight rifles in with nothing but a bi-pod and you could watch the gun jiggle like they were in a earthquake.
Guys sight their rifle offhand....p.s I asked the guy if he was burning up old ammo and gave me the answer of " No, i'm sighting the phucking thing in" and "I don't hunt with a rest, so why would i sight in with one" Then he wondered why it took him a box of shell's to get close, And no he didn't get it sighted in, he just run out of ammo.
People using human silhouette targets to sight in deer rifles.
Guys putting their finger(s) on the barrel.
Man, i could be here all night with this, Point being we would criticize a guy for not practing with a bow but why do rifle shooters not get the same criticism?
I've watched guys sight rifles in with nothing but a bi-pod and you could watch the gun jiggle like they were in a earthquake.
Guys sight their rifle offhand....p.s I asked the guy if he was burning up old ammo and gave me the answer of " No, i'm sighting the phucking thing in" and "I don't hunt with a rest, so why would i sight in with one" Then he wondered why it took him a box of shell's to get close, And no he didn't get it sighted in, he just run out of ammo.
People using human silhouette targets to sight in deer rifles.
Guys putting their finger(s) on the barrel.
Man, i could be here all night with this, Point being we would criticize a guy for not practing with a bow but why do rifle shooters not get the same criticism?