Kimber Rifles
#1
Kimber Rifles
10yrs have past since I last purchased a rifle for myself.
I'm thinking seriously about a Kimber model 8400 in a .308.
What do you guys think of these rifles.
I've read alot of your opinions on Remington, Winchester, Savages Sakos.
but to my knowledge Kimber never really comes up.
The only thing I know about them is that they are American made and as far as I know are made of high quality steel.
I don't mind budgeting extra money for another year or two if this gun is
worth having.
Thanks for your opinions.
I'm thinking seriously about a Kimber model 8400 in a .308.
What do you guys think of these rifles.
I've read alot of your opinions on Remington, Winchester, Savages Sakos.
but to my knowledge Kimber never really comes up.
The only thing I know about them is that they are American made and as far as I know are made of high quality steel.
I don't mind budgeting extra money for another year or two if this gun is
worth having.
Thanks for your opinions.
#4
Typical Buck
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
Posts: 579
RE: Kimber Rifles
I haven't fired one but I have handled many at gander Mountain. They are extremely nice guns. The fit and finish is excellent. I've read many threads about these rifles being very accurate. I understand about budgeting your money. I'm a believer in buying something outstanding once and not buying something to get you by until you can afford better. When you buy something to get you by you have to sale it later and take a loss when you could have saved longer and bought what you wanted upfront. If you have the money to spend I would get the Kimber.
#6
Join Date: May 2004
Location:
Posts: 63
RE: Kimber Rifles
Sorry to rain on the parade...but...I owned a Kimber 84M in .308 and have since sold it. Fit and finish was excellent. Very light.
However, I found it TOO light to shoot with the accuracy I desired. Kimber is a good name and I might buy another someday...but it would be an 8400 and not an 84M.
However, I found it TOO light to shoot with the accuracy I desired. Kimber is a good name and I might buy another someday...but it would be an 8400 and not an 84M.
#8
Join Date: May 2004
Location:
Posts: 63
RE: Kimber Rifles
I think I've spent too much time shooting bull barrel rifles...the transition to an ultralight was just not for me. But then again, there are probabaly better shooters than me who would love the gun.
BTW...I'm talking 300-500 yards shots in South Dakota. Too much muzzle jump (and me trying to counter it by using muscle) to be a good tool at long ranges.
BTW...I'm talking 300-500 yards shots in South Dakota. Too much muzzle jump (and me trying to counter it by using muscle) to be a good tool at long ranges.
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
RE: Kimber Rifles
I totally understand. Just giving you a hard time. For me, physical condition has been the hugest factor. I used to hunt in Newfoundland every year, and getting the lightest stuff possible helped me cover much more ground and hense at least get a shot. I packed around a few bull barrels and won't do it again. I am sure there is a comprimise. I got me a Sako 75 7mmSTW that I believe will be the right comprimise.
#10
RE: Kimber Rifles
The size and weight of this rifle has crossed my mind as well oldgrunt.
I don't know how well I'd shoot this gun under the conditions I hunt either.
I have yet to carry one around for miles and try shooting, let alone pick one up and hold it .You make a good point.
I saw a picture of your Sako 75 you posted on the forum Big Country.
Nice looking rifle.
Might be just what I need, light, comfortable to pack around and a steady shooter.
I'll take a look at both of them this weekend.
I don't know how well I'd shoot this gun under the conditions I hunt either.
I have yet to carry one around for miles and try shooting, let alone pick one up and hold it .You make a good point.
I saw a picture of your Sako 75 you posted on the forum Big Country.
Nice looking rifle.
Might be just what I need, light, comfortable to pack around and a steady shooter.
I'll take a look at both of them this weekend.