Tikka Rifles
#41
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pine Hill Alabama USA
Posts: 1,280
RE: Tikka Rifles
I hate to tell you Todd, but he has helped alot of people on here and as I found out very knowledgable source on rifles. I may not be speaking for everyone on here, but he has much greatercreditabilty than you.
Also, although I have allowed myself to be dragged down to this guys person insult level (my fault, I should be a bigger person and I apologize to the innocent bystanders) I invite you to look back and see who it is that ALWAYS turns the thread negative first and starts hurling smarmy condecending person attacks. It is always him and simply saying, "Oh I admit I'm a little egotistical" is no excuse for it. He is not a nice person.
#42
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 179
RE: Tikka Rifles
A year and a half ago I purchased a Tikka T3 is .243 caliber.I put 5 different boxes of Premium ammunition through it,at different bullet styles and grain weights. The best group I could get out of it was an inch and a half with Remington Scirrocco's,I sold the gun.It should have been a tack driver it wasn't.
Maybe I got a lemon.
Maybe I got a lemon.
#43
Guest
Posts: n/a
RE: Tikka Rifles
Hey Todd, I read all thru those posts and I never saw him being "dishonest". Thats just me.
His idea of mass volumn is right on target. My company does it. All do it. Your 20 guns you mention really doesn't put a dent in teh statistics. Well I am not here to teach you statistics and yields and deviations. I am saying the man did not lie, he has an opinion like yours. I believe the Tikka is a step up from the 710, but I don't like them. I would spend the extra money on a gun I feel is better quality. Has more of the things I am looking for. Now you don't agree, but it doesn't make me a liar.
His concept of Walmart and all that is pretty well a proven business case. And it boils down to your QA department. If you are like my previous company that did things pretty stupid and the QA department is under the same VP as the manufacturing, and your bonus is tied to yields, then he is absolutely correct.
Read thru thier Quarterly statement just ending last month. Its on the SEC website. You will get a feel for how they care for quality, and thier relationship with Walmart. They won't mention them by name but will go far as referring to a company that sells some of the most firearms in america, and thier biggest customer. Read thru it and get a feel for the relationship. I have been ingrained in company/manufacturing/engineering world for 10 years. What the man says makes perfect sense.
His idea of mass volumn is right on target. My company does it. All do it. Your 20 guns you mention really doesn't put a dent in teh statistics. Well I am not here to teach you statistics and yields and deviations. I am saying the man did not lie, he has an opinion like yours. I believe the Tikka is a step up from the 710, but I don't like them. I would spend the extra money on a gun I feel is better quality. Has more of the things I am looking for. Now you don't agree, but it doesn't make me a liar.
His concept of Walmart and all that is pretty well a proven business case. And it boils down to your QA department. If you are like my previous company that did things pretty stupid and the QA department is under the same VP as the manufacturing, and your bonus is tied to yields, then he is absolutely correct.
Read thru thier Quarterly statement just ending last month. Its on the SEC website. You will get a feel for how they care for quality, and thier relationship with Walmart. They won't mention them by name but will go far as referring to a company that sells some of the most firearms in america, and thier biggest customer. Read thru it and get a feel for the relationship. I have been ingrained in company/manufacturing/engineering world for 10 years. What the man says makes perfect sense.
#44
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pine Hill Alabama USA
Posts: 1,280
RE: Tikka Rifles
His concept of Walmart and all that is pretty well a proven business case
I believe the Tikka is a step up from the 710, but I don't like them. I would spend the extra money on a gun I feel is better quality. Has more of the things I am looking for. Now you don't agree, but it doesn't make me a liar.
#48
Guest
Posts: n/a
RE: Tikka Rifles
Medical/Surgical RN Supervisor
#49
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pine Hill Alabama USA
Posts: 1,280
RE: Tikka Rifles
I understand what you are saying. But if a company lets quality suffer because they have bitten off more than they can chew volume wise then I blame them not the client who orders the product. Bottem line it's Remington, Ruger, Savages name on the gun not Wal-marts and their reputation that suffers if it's a POS.
I realize that companies have come out with economy model product lines that certainly sell well to large chains like Wal-Mart. The oft mentioned Rem 710 and Leupolds Rifleman scopes come to mind, but keep in mind if there wasn't a market for these products then they wouldn't make them and stores like Wal-Mart wouldn't sell them. As long as thats the case I don't blame the companies. No one is obligated to buy them and it's no secret that they are a lower budget econo model compared to these companies regular line up. Ultimately these products will live or die based on consumer acceptance or rejection of them.
I realize that companies have come out with economy model product lines that certainly sell well to large chains like Wal-Mart. The oft mentioned Rem 710 and Leupolds Rifleman scopes come to mind, but keep in mind if there wasn't a market for these products then they wouldn't make them and stores like Wal-Mart wouldn't sell them. As long as thats the case I don't blame the companies. No one is obligated to buy them and it's no secret that they are a lower budget econo model compared to these companies regular line up. Ultimately these products will live or die based on consumer acceptance or rejection of them.