View Poll Results: A poll

Bushnell

235

14.03%

Leupold

681

40.66%

Simmons

5.31%

Tasco

2.87%

Zeiss

145

8.66%

Swaroski

5.07%

Redfield

2.75%

Weaver

1.61%

other

319

19.04%

Voters: 1675. You may not vote on this poll

Which Scope?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

07-13-2009 | 05:53 AM

#251

cooper_m22

Fork Horn

Joined: Jun 2008

Posts: 323

Likes: 0

From: from Kentucky now live in Montana

Quote:

Originally Posted by thndrchiken

I have Bushnell Elites, Nikon Buckmasters, Leupolds and one Zeiss. If I had to replace one I'd be buying another Conquest.

I 2nd that. Zeiss Conquest all the way.

07-14-2009 | 05:48 PM

#252

13pointjomc

Nontypical Buck

Joined: May 2009

Posts: 1,060

Likes: 0

From: NE Alabama

Leupold Rifleman 3x9x40 on my 243.

07-17-2009 | 02:09 PM

#253

bush_pig

Fork Horn

Joined: Jul 2009

Posts: 141

Likes: 0

From: Molong,NSW Australia

I like Swaroski just because of how clear it is but I don't have the money to buy one but when I do I will buy one.

08-01-2009 | 04:58 PM

#254

DrAsus

Fork Horn

Joined: Dec 2008

Posts: 126

Likes: 0

From:

Quote:

Originally Posted by KBM

I switched from Leupold to Nikon about 4 years ago. I love this scope! I think right now it's the best scope on the market.

Nikon Monarch 2.5-10X42 BDC or 3-12x42 BDC

I agree!!! I personally think Nikon is where its at...for the money! I mean are Zeiss and Swarvoski better....probably....but when I can buy 2-3...maybe even 4 Nikons for the price of a Swavoski...I mean come on. I'm not rich and I don't have anything against those who can afford a Swarvoski....I'll definitely have one if I win the lottery LOL!! I have a Nikon Omega on my TC Triumph and plan on getting a Nikon Monarch 2.5-10X42 for my Browning in the very near future.----Dr ASUS

08-22-2009 | 07:22 PM

#255

paterlog

Spike

Joined: Aug 2007

Posts: 7

Likes: 0

I just got a swift and I'm very pleased.

08-22-2009 | 10:17 PM

#256

will79

Fork Horn

Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 112

Likes: 0

Fixed 4X leupold or weaver K4

09-14-2009 | 07:09 AM

#257

BOWHUNTERCOP

Nontypical Buck

Joined: Feb 2003

Posts: 3,901

Likes: 0

From: Warren County NJ USA

dollar for dollar you can't beat the Leupolds, I have the VX-II 3-9x40 on all but one firearm I own

11-05-2009 | 03:27 AM

#258

brasmunky

Spike

Joined: Oct 2009

Posts: 22

Likes: 0

I disagree with the comment about leupold being best deal for the money. I did a little research on entry level scopes for a guy($200 range) and came up with these specs. these are all 3x9x40

Burris Fullfield II
eye relief-3.1"-3.8"
light transmission- 95%
MOA adjustments- 1/4" @100 yards max adjustment 50
actual maximum magnification- 9x
lifetime warranty
manufactured in both the USA and Philipines(depends on demand)

Nikon Buckmaster
eye relief- 3.6"
light transmission- 92%
MOA adjustments- 1/4" @100 yards max adjustment 80
actual maximum magnification- 9x
lifetime warranty
manufatured somewhere in asia

Leupold rifleman
eye relief- 3.7"
light transmission- 82%
MOA adjustments- 1/2"@100yards max adjustment 56 elevation 52 windage
lifetime warranty
manufactured in USA

The way I see it the Leupold doesnt even fit into the same class even though it costs the same amount. The only reason i can think of is the whole made in USA thing but IMO that is crap. I am pretty sure thats why GM and Chrysler just had to take a bail out from government and are still on a pretty slippery slope. It just doesnt make sense to me an inferior product for the same price its just stupid.