Barrel length for 270win?
02-20-2004 | 11:17 AM
#4
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,283
Likes: 0
From: NC
RE: Barrel length for 270win?
If i had a choice i'd get the 24" as well, however the 22" is sufficient and either will do fine from a 270 win. You may be able to get a little more velocity out of the 24" but i don't think you'll be able to tell the difference unless shooting thru a chrony.
02-20-2004 | 11:45 AM
#5
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
From:
RE: Barrel length for 270win?
Hi Back40,
I guess before I'd answer that question I'd ask myself.....how to I envision using this rifle most of the time? If the answer is a short walk in to sit on a stand overlooking lots of open space......I'd take the 24". If I planned on using it in an environment that is predominantly open.....and long shots are the rule.....I'd take the 24". If I intended to use it anywhere the extra 2" wouldn't extract a penalty......I'd take the 24".
But if I intended to use it in thick, heavy, cover. Or if I was going to be carrying it all the time, (little sitting.....or other means of travel), or if I was hunting in an area where a "long shot" is only 200 yards......I'd take the 22" barrel.
The .270 Winchester gives up very little in the way of meaningful velocity when it goes from a 24" barrel to a 22" barrel. But it does give up something in handiness. I'd decide what I intended it's predominant use would be.....and make my decision accordingly!
Good luck with your decision!
Dave
I guess before I'd answer that question I'd ask myself.....how to I envision using this rifle most of the time? If the answer is a short walk in to sit on a stand overlooking lots of open space......I'd take the 24". If I planned on using it in an environment that is predominantly open.....and long shots are the rule.....I'd take the 24". If I intended to use it anywhere the extra 2" wouldn't extract a penalty......I'd take the 24".
But if I intended to use it in thick, heavy, cover. Or if I was going to be carrying it all the time, (little sitting.....or other means of travel), or if I was hunting in an area where a "long shot" is only 200 yards......I'd take the 22" barrel.
The .270 Winchester gives up very little in the way of meaningful velocity when it goes from a 24" barrel to a 22" barrel. But it does give up something in handiness. I'd decide what I intended it's predominant use would be.....and make my decision accordingly!
Good luck with your decision!
Dave
02-20-2004 | 12:56 PM
#7
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,921
Likes: 0
From: Saskatchewan Canada
RE: Barrel length for 270win?
I have both one a pump 22" and abolt 24" barrel, both harvested animals with little troubles
. As AK mentioned it really depends on your situation and application which one will be best suited.
. As AK mentioned it really depends on your situation and application which one will be best suited.
02-21-2004 | 04:47 AM
#9
Host of Hosts
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,780
Likes: 0
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
RE: Barrel length for 270win?
I've got a 270 with a 22' barrel and one with a 24' inch barrel. They both kill deer or anything I shoot with them. Most manufacturers use a 22' barrel on their Non-Magnum rifles. I guess this could be to save costs in manufacturing, but I think they do it because it works. I don't notice all that much difference in the two that I have. Both are accurate and dependable rifles!
