Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
Revolvers will get you killed >

Revolvers will get you killed

Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

Revolvers will get you killed

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-02-2017, 11:44 AM
  #41  
Nontypical Buck
 
Nomercy448's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,905
Default

Originally Posted by flags
Ever hunted with a muzzleloader? Didn't take any iffy shots that you would try with a repeating gun did you?
Yes, I have and do hunt with ML's.

No, I don't take "iffy shots" with my repeaters which I would not take with my ML's.

Pretty simple - I don't take "iffy shots."

Never have I had a firearm force me into an iffy shot, nor have I felt compelled to take one simply because I had a fast follow up.

So again - prove to me it is more about the gun than it is the shooter, and maybe your argument will hold water.
Nomercy448 is offline  
Old 05-02-2017, 11:47 AM
  #42  
Super Moderator
 
CalHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern California
Posts: 18,382
Default

I think people that spray and pray (although I doubt they have sufficient mindset to actually pray) are likely to shoot fast without aiming, regardless of whether they have a high cap pistol, single stack, revolver or even just a single shot. People without fire discipline (aiming your shots) usually fire indiscriminately in practice and then panic to some degree in real life. It's kind of like buck fever but is a little more complex than that. Realistic training, lots of practice and good mental preparation is the key to resisting the urge to spray and pray.

Good mental preparation is especially important because not everybody handles stress the same way, particularly when it's your life that's on the line. That's just a fact of life, whether you're in combat, in a police shooting incident or a CCW shooting incident. Based on my experience, I would suggest that it's the mental preparation that causes "spray and pray" far more than how many rounds your pistol holds.
CalHunter is offline  
Old 05-02-2017, 12:56 PM
  #43  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 9,230
Default

Originally Posted by Nomercy448
So again - prove to me it is more about the gun than it is the shooter, and maybe your argument will hold water.
Are you serious? I can't prove anything like that beyond a shadow of a doubt. I even admitted it is a general statement and a general statement, by definition, has exceptions and doesn't apply everywhere. If you bother reading you will see where I even admitted that. I also used the word "tend" several times. Now if you're having difficulty understanding that word allow me to give you the meaning of it:

Tend: regularly or frequently behave in a particular way or have a certain characteristic / be liable to possess or display (a particular characteristic).

Note the word tend is not an absolute. But since you seem to having some sort of issue I guess that I will just bow to your superior knowledge despite the fact that several members, including myself, have some actual experience in the matter while you openly admit you have none. But as is often the case, those with little or no experience seem to think they are experts so I bow down to you and accept the fact that I don't know what the heck I'm talking about.

Now I throw your challenge back at you: Prove to me, beyond a shadow of a doubt that a higher amount of ammo available DOES NOT lead to people shooting uncontrollably. Give me the proof in the same way you demand the proof. Can't do it can you?

Last edited by flags; 05-03-2017 at 03:52 AM.
flags is offline  
Old 05-02-2017, 01:20 PM
  #44  
Nontypical Buck
 
younggun308's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 4,264
Default

Y'all are hilarious.
More knowledgeable than I'm likely to be on these topics at any point in my life, but hilarious, nonetheless. You literally don't disagree, but are disagreeing, anyway.
younggun308 is offline  
Old 05-02-2017, 03:40 PM
  #45  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 995
Default

Flags and NoMercy448, you are both correct. With some people, having an excessive amount of ammo available may lead to less worry about targeting while with others it may not. I only know how it affects me and my own shooting. I would have to imagine that anyone with good training would always try to keep in mind round count and target count. Good training leads to good decision making. Then you have the weekend warriors that panic and very well could fall into the misinformed mindset that a lot of rounds fired blindly will win. High ammo availability could in fact be part of their decision making process in the heat of the moment. Those people are the ones that will be lucky if they survive any encounter and so to will be any innocent by standers. And Flags, before you ask, yes sir I have had more than my fair share of engagements and it was not only my training that saved my bacon but also my mindset. The old man trained each and every one of his kids to be able to defend ourselves in just about any given situation. Hand to hand, knife to hand, or firefights, we all trained from very young ages to take any and all measures required to come out alive at the other end.
hunters_life is offline  
Old 05-03-2017, 01:40 PM
  #46  
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
 
uncle matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Darien, IL
Posts: 6,744
Default

Originally Posted by flags
Bull. If you know you have a lot of rounds you don't take as much time with your sight picture, remember it is a general statement and won't apply to every shooter so don't take it as an absolute. Bottom line when you don't have many you tend to make them count. Kind of like the old saying: Beware the man that hunts with a single shot, he can hit what he aims at. Ever hunted with a muzzleloader? Didn't take any iffy shots that you would try with a repeating gun did you? It's the same concept. Rounds on target is the most important aspect of going home alive.

If you dump a full mag of 15 rounds in a 9mm but don't take the time to actually aim them then a guy like me, with a 6 shot revolver in any caliber you care to mention, will probably win the gunfight. Rounds that hit flesh count, rounds that hit sheetrock don't. This is why my unit had us load minimal rounds in our rigs and still require a successful engagement of multiple targets, you learn to make the shots count and that is what matters. Spray and pray leads to bleed and die.

But hey, what do I know? I only survived a couple of fire fights and you admit you've never been in one. You obviously know more about it than I do.
I am in agreement with Flegs on this one. Just like money, when you're loaded you tend to spend pretty freely and when funds are tight you really think about each purchase.
uncle matt is offline  
Old 05-03-2017, 01:40 PM
  #47  
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
 
uncle matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Darien, IL
Posts: 6,744
Default

Also as the OP I would like to keep the subject on carrying the weapon and not home defense.
uncle matt is offline  
Old 05-04-2017, 05:06 PM
  #48  
Nontypical Buck
 
Nomercy448's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,905
Default

I CAN AND HAVE provided proof that semiauto pistols do not cause the shooter to lose their inherent sense of trigger discipline and round management. I'm holding a loaded G19 at the range right now, and firing slow fire with one hand and typing this with the other.

The pistol isn't making me spray bullets without concern for connecting on target.

Proving exclusions is a lot easier than proving inclusions, in this case.

Pistols don't make people take bad shots. People who are prone to take bad shots may be more prone to use a pistol, but that's correlation, not causality.

I also asked you - knowing you HAVE been in military firefights using fully automatic weapons, AND knowing you are a shooter who holds a high trigger discipline and round management... Did carrying that autoloader FORCE you, the shooter pulling the trigger, to exhibit less target discipline?

My contention remains to be that an inanimate object cannot cause a shooter to lose their discipline.
Nomercy448 is offline  
Old 05-04-2017, 05:16 PM
  #49  
Nontypical Buck
 
Nomercy448's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 3,905
Default

Originally Posted by flags
The man with fewer shots available will not waste them.
Where does the word "tend," or any synonym therefor appear in this statement? Being THIS is the original statement you made, and the particular one I made comment as being a ridiculous stereotypic statement which confuses correlation with causality, and propagates an unfortunate lie which sure sounds good to folks who don't know any better.

Last edited by Nomercy448; 05-05-2017 at 05:43 AM.
Nomercy448 is offline  
Old 05-05-2017, 03:13 AM
  #50  
Dominant Buck
 
Champlain Islander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: On an Island in Vermont
Posts: 22,605
Default

The spray and pray is further fostered by the media via the cop shows showing the common theme of the bad guys pulling out a fully auto and emptying clips shooting at parked cars while the cop is hiding behind it. The cop pops up and takes a single shot and drops the thug. Hollywood at it's finest. Another thing that makes me laugh is there is never recoil when it shows people shooting.
Champlain Islander is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.