HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Guns (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/guns-10/)
-   -   Connecticut Tragedy (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/guns/376539-connecticut-tragedy.html)

Valentine 12-19-2012 03:10 AM

One thing is for sure
 
The U.S. Congress won't pass any gun law banning the Taliban from having AK 47's.

Jim Burns 12-19-2012 07:06 AM


Originally Posted by browtine7 (Post 4018020)
You sir are wrong. He would have gottrn his hands on a gun some other way if he was determined to do this. There are so many ways to do so all the way down to just stealing them from random home break ins and so fouth

I believe you are wrong! You are making a persumption that he would steal one. If they are laying arround the house where he has acsess to one and he gets the notion, it is alot easier to act upon it in a fit of rage than to go out and try and steal one.

browtine7 12-19-2012 09:48 AM


Originally Posted by Jim Burns (Post 4018127)
I believe you are wrong! You are making a persumption that he would steal one. If they are laying arround the house where he has acsess to one and he gets the notion, it is alot easier to act upon it in a fit of rage than to go out and try and steal one.

I agree it is easier but I decided that I was gonna kill someone I do not belive it would matter to me how I killed them a gun, a bomb, a baseball bat, a knife or just run over them with my vehicle. If you Libs want to give up your guns then go right ahead but I will stick with my 2nd amendment right. If someone is sick enough to do such a terrible act then no dang gun control will help. From reading some of your oyher post on some topics I do believe you probably to need to give your guns up as you have stated you would kill a human oyer a dog. Now thats pretty dang bad!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jim Burns 12-19-2012 10:29 AM


Originally Posted by browtine7 (Post 4018171)
I agree it is easier but I decided that I was gonna kill someone I do not belive it would matter to me how I killed them a gun, a bomb, a baseball bat, a knife or just run over them with my vehicle. If you Libs want to give up your guns then go right ahead but I will stick with my 2nd amendment right. If someone is sick enough to do such a terrible act then no dang gun control will help. From reading some of your oyher post on some topics I do believe you probably to need to give your guns up as you have stated you would kill a human oyer a dog. Now thats pretty dang bad!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You are mistaken, I am not giving up my guns! And yeah, I make a living with my dogs, if someone was to shoot them, that is jeopardizing my livelyhood and how I provide for my family. You actually think I would let someone do that?

sconnyhunter 12-19-2012 10:33 AM


Originally Posted by Jim Burns (Post 4018184)
You are mistaken, I am not giving up my guns!

But you're OK forcing others to, is that it?:sad0064:

Jim Burns 12-19-2012 10:38 AM


Originally Posted by sconnyhunter (Post 4018188)
But you're OK forcing others to, is that it?:sad0064:

Where do you guys come up with that crap? All I said is if she should have had the guns locked up in a safe where someone that has known mental problems couldnt get to them. I NEVER said anything about taken away guns. I have a Bushmaster and it isnt going anywhere.

sconnyhunter 12-19-2012 10:50 AM

Was there evidence that she didn't lock up her guns? No, her being dead is not proof.

Jim Burns 12-19-2012 10:57 AM


Originally Posted by sconnyhunter (Post 4018198)
Was there evidence that she didn't lock up her guns? No, her being dead is not proof.

How did he get the guns, if he had no acsess to them? He obviously had acsess, he shot her before he got the guns.

browtine7 12-19-2012 01:52 PM


Originally Posted by Jim Burns (Post 4018184)
You are mistaken, I am not giving up my guns! And yeah, I make a living with my dogs, if someone was to shoot them, that is jeopardizing my livelyhood and how I provide for my family. You actually think I would let someone do that?

Dude you got problems if you would shoot someone over a dog wether you make a living with them or not. I would whoop someones butt over that and press chargers butt never even consider shooting
someone over it. Hell if you was a heavy equipment operator and someone stole your bulldozer would you shoot them. They would be affecting your lively hood. Its people that think you that DOES NOT NEED TO HAVE GUNS. Cause its not the guns its the idiots with guns

Jim Burns 12-19-2012 02:16 PM


Originally Posted by browtine7 (Post 4018259)
Dude you got problems if you would shoot someone over a dog wether you make a living with them or not. I would whoop someones butt over that and press chargers butt never even consider shooting
someone over it. Hell if you was a heavy equipment operator and someone stole your bulldozer would you shoot them. They would be affecting your lively hood. Its people that think you that DOES NOT NEED TO HAVE GUNS. Cause its not the guns its the idiots with guns

My dogs are not just tools. The bulldozer isnt a living breathing member of my family that was raised from a pup and spent 1000's of hours training it. I wouldnt just shoot anyone over a dog, but if someone blatantly shot my dog with out a very good reason, they would probably have to shoot me in order to get me off of them, and believe me I am a permit carring citizen that is always armed. There is no reason to shoot a mans hunting dog, they have a collar with the name, address and phone #, call the owner and be civil, not every hound hunter is a dick. I know they are alot of them out there but you can not catagorize all hound hunters as the same.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:17 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.