Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
Wood or synthetic stock >

Wood or synthetic stock

Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

Wood or synthetic stock

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-27-2013, 08:38 AM
  #21  
Giant Nontypical
 
Gm54-120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,605
Default

I have both and i prefer to hunt with a good composite, especially a good Kelvar/graphite composite that only weighs about 20ozs or less.
Gm54-120 is offline  
Old 08-03-2013, 12:30 PM
  #22  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Buffalo, WY
Posts: 992
Default

On a snowy winter evening I love to sit by the fire and admire the beautiful wood and rich blue on my wood stocked rifles.

When I head out up the mountain it's almost always a stainless / synthetic rifle that goes with me.
Bullcamp82834 is offline  
Old 08-03-2013, 02:35 PM
  #23  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 538
Default

My teenage sons and myself are heading to the range in the morning. About an hour ago I pulled 4 rifles out of the safe and laid them on the floor, all were synthetic with matte bluing, borrrring. Wasn't planning on it but I was forced to grab a couple wood stocked beauties just to add character. Nothing wrong with synthetic but something special about nice walnut or even laminate. As I get older, I'm not as worried about the dings and scratches, I say their from "use not abuse".
Wayspr is offline  
Old 08-11-2013, 02:51 PM
  #24  
Fork Horn
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 105
Default

It depends on the gun. A high end heirloom quality gun usually only comes in wood and that's because a high quality English/French high grade walnut blank to make the stock cost as much as the average rifle. Synthetic stocks on a high end rifle is about as appealing as plastic leather on a Porsche 911, which you can't get for the same reasons as mentioned. I believe in shooting/hunting with all my guns regardless of price. Good walnut is tough and has been the standard from the beginning. Every mark tells a story and only adds to the character. I have no emotional attachments to my synthetic/stainless rifles. They are a tool and that's it. Rifles under $1k can go either way. Cheap rifles are better with synthetic stocks than with a poor wood stock not properly bedded. Good high quality walnut stocks are expensive and need to be done correctly and when bedded correctly they will hold up every bit as good as plastic stocks.

Last edited by Mystro; 08-11-2013 at 02:56 PM.
Mystro is offline  
Old 08-11-2013, 06:51 PM
  #25  
Typical Buck
 
Murdy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: North Central Illinois
Posts: 848
Default

I think part of the problem with wood these days is that unless you are buying a (very) high-end gun, the quality just isn't there any more. I have an old 8mm Mauser that my Grandfather had a custom Monte Carlo stock put on in the 1950s that's still in great shape. I also have an 870 that's 6 years old that hasn't worn so well. So, for my average purchase, I will be buying synthetic (and probably stainless as well, because I haven't been real happy with some of the bluing on my recent purchases).
Murdy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.