![]() |
T/C icon or ruger no.1
OK so i have some money floating around and want a new rifle. I have narrowed it down to the T/C icon or the ruger no. 1. I have a 308 or 30-06 in mind. I will be hunting whitetails, and hopefully elk in the next few years. Please include why you favor one rifle over the other.
Thanks in advance. |
TC Venture, put the savings towards a better scope.
Don't want a single shot rifle anyway ! |
Originally Posted by iconhunter10
(Post 3880271)
OK so i have some money floating around and want a new rifle. I have narrowed it down to the T/C icon or the ruger no. 1. I have a 308 or 30-06 in mind. I will be hunting whitetails, and hopefully elk in the next few years. Please include why you favor one rifle over the other.
Thanks in advance. ![]() I would like to have a Ruger #1 as well but I would want it chambered in a "big bore" cartridge. |
i personally love the look of the ruger no. 1. once i get some money i think that's the next gun i will be purchasing. i honestly can't speak for either, because i've never shot either. But having one shot will make you, make sure that shot will be dead on. i have done target shooting and hunting with some single shot rifles and i think they have made me a better shot. good luck on your purchase.
|
I really enjoy shooting my Ruger #1A Sporter in 6.5 Creedmoor. I have never shot the Icon. Although I have no complaints with my Ruger's accuracy, I have heard some bad stories about them, and I noticed the Icon comes with an accuracy guarantee. Good luck.
|
Apples and Oranges?
Personally, I think it's very hard to choose between such different rifles, but here are my thoughts...
1) T/C is new to this bolt action rifle thing. Not necessarily a bad thing, since they could have learned a lot from seeing what OTHERS did, but on the other hand, there's usually a learning curve for any new manufacturer. The Ruger No.1 is a time tested design. Favor: Ruger. 2) A single shot rifle, no matter how fast you practice, it's still slower, and more apt to fumble than a repeater. It also means you're carrying ammo separately, which leaves you more apt to forget it, or lose it while trekking in elk country. Favor: T/C. 3) For the design, the Ruger is heavy, 1/4lb heavier than the Icon in fact. No, it's not "heavy", but for a single shot, it's pretty weighty, but then again, it's a real rifle, not a break action abomination. It's not a major consideration, but it IS a heavy single shot. Some people still follow the "heavy is good" mantra, since it means it's made from quality materials, but you still have to carry it. Favor: Neither (same weight). 4) The T/C is cheaper, about $100-150 cheaper in fact. Favor: T/C. 5) The No.1 has a finer finish (from the Icon's I've seen at least). Favor: Ruger. 6) The "It-Factor". I love Rugers, and I absolutely love Ruger No.1's (I've owned several over the years, still holding onto 3 of them). Favor: Ruger. So my money would get spent on the Ruger. But maybe you weight the above values differently than I do. |
Originally Posted by Nomercy448
(Post 3881537)
Personally, I think it's very hard to choose between such different rifles, but here are my thoughts...
1) T/C is new to this bolt action rifle thing. Not necessarily a bad thing, since they could have learned a lot from seeing what OTHERS did, but on the other hand, there's usually a learning curve for any new manufacturer. The Ruger No.1 is a time tested design. Favor: Ruger. 2) A single shot rifle, no matter how fast you practice, it's still slower, and more apt to fumble than a repeater. It also means you're carrying ammo separately, which leaves you more apt to forget it, or lose it while trekking in elk country. Favor: T/C. 3) For the design, the Ruger is heavy, 1/4lb heavier than the Icon in fact. No, it's not "heavy", but for a single shot, it's pretty weighty, but then again, it's a real rifle, not a break action abomination. It's not a major consideration, but it IS a heavy single shot. Some people still follow the "heavy is good" mantra, since it means it's made from quality materials, but you still have to carry it. Favor: Neither (same weight). 4) The T/C is cheaper, about $100-150 cheaper in fact. Favor: T/C. 5) The No.1 has a finer finish (from the Icon's I've seen at least). Favor: Ruger. 6) The "It-Factor". I love Rugers, and I absolutely love Ruger No.1's (I've owned several over the years, still holding onto 3 of them). Favor: Ruger. So my money would get spent on the Ruger. But maybe you weight the above values differently than I do. +100. I love Ruger #1's (even tho I only have one currently). |
+2 99.99%
I'll take the TC Venture for all the reasons you mentioned. Plus With its 5R rifled precision barrel, adjustable trigger, Hogue traction panels, Melanite Coated Bolt and Guaranteed MOA Accuracy. "The T/C is cheaper, about $100-150 cheaper" not sure about this one (see below - I'm sure you can get them both cheaper) ??? http://www.ableammo.com/catalog/thom...-p-113410.html http://www.ableammo.com/catalog/ruge...h-p-86509.html |
Originally Posted by Sheridan
(Post 3884185)
"The T/C is cheaper, about $100-150 cheaper" not sure about this one (see below - I'm sure you can get them both cheaper) ???
http://www.ableammo.com/catalog/thom...-p-113410.html http://www.ableammo.com/catalog/ruge...h-p-86509.html Granted, both are more expensive than the Venture, but the guy wasn't asking about the Venture. |
Originally Posted by Nomercy448
(Post 3884204)
I just used the prices I get from Davidson's. I get $955 on Ruger No.1's, and $785 on the Icon's. So it's really more like $200 difference.
Granted, both are more expensive than the Venture, but the guy wasn't asking about the Venture. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:39 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.