Between S&W and Beretta
#1
Typical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Col. Oh.
Posts: 561
Between S&W and Beretta
I have a choice to make here. On one hand I have a Beretta 96. On the other hand ,a S&W M&P. Both are used guns. The 96 has a lot of holster wear[ a former police issue]. The M&P seems spotless. I really like the sights on the M&P. The front sight on the 96 has been worn and is shiny on the tips. Both are .40 cal. The M&P had to be sold so early for a reason. Not sure why. The saleman really likes the Beretta for some reason. He owns one and loves it. I have to say the S&W felt really natural in my hand. Not sure what is better ;poly or steel frame. Just getting into pistols. Any thoughts or guidance would be great. This will be my last pistol until something breaks.
#3
I have a choice to make here. On one hand I have a Beretta 96. On the other hand ,a S&W M&P. Both are used guns. The 96 has a lot of holster wear[ a former police issue]. The M&P seems spotless. I really like the sights on the M&P. The front sight on the 96 has been worn and is shiny on the tips. Both are .40 cal. The M&P had to be sold so early for a reason. Not sure why. The saleman really likes the Beretta for some reason. He owns one and loves it. I have to say the S&W felt really natural in my hand. Not sure what is better ;poly or steel frame. Just getting into pistols. Any thoughts or guidance would be great. This will be my last pistol until something breaks.
#5
Fork Horn
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 136
You answered your own question. The one that "feels natural" in your hand is the best bet. It will most likely point in a natural way too.
From what you said, the Smith is in far better condition with less signs of wear and less use. If it were my choice, I would go with the Smith. Feel is is everything. The pistol should be a natural extension of your hand.
From what you said, the Smith is in far better condition with less signs of wear and less use. If it were my choice, I would go with the Smith. Feel is is everything. The pistol should be a natural extension of your hand.
#6
Typical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Col. Oh.
Posts: 561
Good call. I actually just put that one on law away today. I can't give you credit though. I didn't read your post until I got home. I just couldn't justify spending more money for a used gun when a new SD is so similar.
#7
Not looking for credit, I really like mine, hope you like it!
#8
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,828
How's the trigger pull on the S&W? I had a Smith and Wesson SV40 Sigma and the trigger pull really sucked. I now have a H&K USP 40 and difference is like night and day. The military uses Berettas so that should say something. I've never owned one though.
#9
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,526
Different branches within the military use a ton of different pistols including Glock, Sig Sauer, and H&K.
#10
Typical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Col. Oh.
Posts: 561
The trigger on the SD is around 8 pounds ,I think. It felt pretty smooth. I think the SD and the M&P share the same trigger. They felt about the same. @ Mr MC54, I know you weren't looking for credit. I was just funnin ya.LOL. I'm sure I will like the SD. The Beretta is also a fine gun. I have shorter fingers though. I don't really have small hands, just sausage fingers. I felt like a little kid holding his dad's gun. I couldn't get past that feeling. Both the M&P and the SD felt great in my hands. Both pointed well. I like the grip better on the M&P but not enough to buy a used gun for 150 dollars more than I could buy a new one. They are way to similar to justify that. Can't wait to throw some lead through it. Now all I need to do is learn how to shoot.LOL. Thanks to all for the free advice.