Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

Lawmaker: If Health Care Required, Why Not Guns?

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-01-2011 | 11:01 AM
  #1  
Dakota Swede's Avatar
Thread Starter
Spike
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Unityville, South Dakota
Default Lawmaker: If Health Care Required, Why Not Guns?

Now people out here in South Dakota can be a bit sarcastic at times, but this news clip made me smile.

http://www.keloland.com/NewsDetail6162.cfm?Id=110128

----------------------------------------------------------

Lawmaker: If Health Care Required, Why Not Guns?
Published: February 1, 2011, 10:34 AM

Bookmark and Share Lawmaker: If Health Care Required, Why Not Guns?
PIERRE, SD - If the federal government can require every person to buy health insurance, a South Dakota lawmaker says the state can require every person to buy a gun.

That's the logic behind a bill proposed by Rep. Hal Wick, a Republican from Sioux Falls. Wick's proposal would force every South Dakotan over the age of 21 to buy a firearm for self-defense. He argues that such a requirement makes sense to "provide for everyone's protection," just as supporters of the health care legislation say all Americans need coverage.

Wick says he believes the bill won't pass but he introduced it to make the point that the health care mandate is unconstitutional. South Dakota is among 26 states that have sued the federal government over the health care overhaul.
Dakota Swede is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.