Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

Experience with the Marlin 336C in .35 Rem

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-31-2010 | 06:07 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Spike
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Default Experience with the Marlin 336C in .35 Rem

I'm new here. I'm pondering getting a Marlin 336C in .35 Rem. Why? Because in some places I hunt for whitetail deer, the shots are really close. I'm talking 20-50 yards in fairly thick cover. I usually use a .270 or a 7mm-08, and I've had perfect success with each. However, since I love guns and I keep trying to come up with reasons to buy more, I feel the need for a bigger, slower bullet in a lever action. Anyone here shot many deer with a .35 Rem? The deer I've shot at close range with my other rifles have run off before dropping, even with good shot placement. Will a .35 Rem have more "thump" and knockdown at close range than the .270 and 7mm-08? I looked at the .358 Win in Browning BLR, but it may kick a good bit more and it costs a lot more, and I don't think I'm gaining anything in knockdown power. Bullets are a lot harder to find in .358Win too. I'd love to hear your thoughts on the .35 Rem.
cullbuck is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-2010 | 02:43 AM
  #2  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,284
Likes: 3
From: west central wi USA
Default

A friend of mine who hunts the big woods picked a scoped one up several years ago. He prefers it to his .270 for deer and bear. Not much more recoil than a 30-30.
Wingbone is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-2010 | 04:26 AM
  #3  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
Default 35 Rem; over a century old; successfully used

First, according to my count there are over 15 some rifle cartridges used successfully on deer. So you can spend some money owning them all.
The 35 Rem. was successful for years, as long as you didn't have a 200 or 300 yard shot on a deer.
Of course it was falling out of popularity with many. way back thirty and forty years ago.
One young hunter got kidded because he was using that slow, fat cartridge, while they had moved on to more modern calibers like 30-06, .308 and .270. Of course, the .35 Rem hunter would call up a buddy or two to come see the deer he harvested.

The hunter specialized in sole hunting in the swamps. He spent some time at the rifle range and was only interested in dropping a deer where he shot it.
Of course that was in old times. His mind wasn't cluttered with all those new high powered cartridges, that have a number and followed by "fourteen letters". How could that hunter possible compete today with these cartridges, seen as essential.

Oh, he still has the old .35 Rem. Marlin rifle, he hopes to get out later this month, for some deep woods hunting.
Valentine is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-2010 | 08:28 AM
  #4  
VAhuntr's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,116
Likes: 0
From: VA, USA
Default

What ammo are you using in the 270 and 7mm-08 and what do you consider "perfect" shot placement?
VAhuntr is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-2010 | 10:27 AM
  #5  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 0
From: Adirondacks
Default

I hear ya!I've got a 7x57 and a .280 but also have a hankering for a Marlin lever most likely in .35.I doubt it will make any difference in how far they go before dropping but it's a really nice gun/cartridge.
Bernie P. is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-2010 | 12:19 PM
  #6  
Sheridan's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
From:
Default

I own that Marlin 336C in .35 remington you're talking about.

http://www.impactguns.com/store/336C-35REM.html


#1 I'll never scope it (it's for those quick shots in thick cover).

#2 I was in NJ and hunted the tri-state area and wanted a cartridge that could handle black bears as well.

#3 .30-30 ammo is much easier to find, as a rule.
Sheridan is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-2010 | 01:07 PM
  #7  
Thread Starter
Spike
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by VAhuntr
What ammo are you using in the 270 and 7mm-08 and what do you consider "perfect" shot placement?
I use the 130 gr Hornady SST in the .270 and the 138 gr SP "Light Magnum" for the 7mm-08. I consider perfect shot placement in the low front shoulder that hits the heart or lung area near the heart. These are close shots (20-50 yards). I said I had perfect results (one shot kills) but not perfect shot placement. I had good shot placement (which is kinda where I defined perfect shot placement). I guess if I had perfect shot placement I'd hit them in the heart every time. I did hit more than one in the heart though, and it ran several yards. I don't see any shock from the bullet strike. It's like I'm shooting them with a compound bow. I hit one 8 pt through the front shoulders at 20 yards with the 7mm-08 and it bulldozed it's way out of sight using the back legs only. Really wierd.

Last edited by cullbuck; 11-01-2010 at 01:14 PM.
cullbuck is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-2010 | 02:48 PM
  #8  
redgreen's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 1
From: Alberta Canada
Default

I had an old neighbour that used his 35 Remington for moose. He never lost one.
redgreen is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-2010 | 04:33 PM
  #9  
Spike
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: new york
Default

35 rem with a 180 grain bullet will definitely be good for your situation. You can also get by with the Ruger 44 semi-auto. Shoots everything from 180s to 300s
afternooner319 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-01-2010 | 05:24 PM
  #10  
VAhuntr's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,116
Likes: 0
From: VA, USA
Default

Originally Posted by cullbuck
I use the 130 gr Hornady SST in the .270 and the 138 gr SP "Light Magnum" for the 7mm-08. I consider perfect shot placement in the low front shoulder that hits the heart or lung area near the heart. These are close shots (20-50 yards). I said I had perfect results (one shot kills) but not perfect shot placement. I had good shot placement (which is kinda where I defined perfect shot placement). I guess if I had perfect shot placement I'd hit them in the heart every time. I did hit more than one in the heart though, and it ran several yards. I don't see any shock from the bullet strike. It's like I'm shooting them with a compound bow. I hit one 8 pt through the front shoulders at 20 yards with the 7mm-08 and it bulldozed it's way out of sight using the back legs only. Really wierd.

I've always been impressed with how quickly the 270 and the various 7mm's have dispatched deer for me in the past. However, if I wanted something to put the close range thump on game, I'd look at the 444 Marlin, 450 Marlin or the tried and true 45-70.
VAhuntr is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.