Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
TIKKA or WINCHESTER >

TIKKA or WINCHESTER

Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

TIKKA or WINCHESTER

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-07-2010, 11:04 AM
  #11  
Giant Nontypical
 
Sheridan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 5,130
Default

Winchester or Sako would be a far more fair comparison.


I do however, like those Tikka lites for the money.


http://www.tikka.fi/t3models.php?litess

Last edited by Sheridan; 02-07-2010 at 11:06 AM.
Sheridan is offline  
Old 02-07-2010, 03:11 PM
  #12  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: central florida
Posts: 857
Default

The tikkas cheap but that model 70 featherweight is a damnfine rifle if you can afford it
podunk kennels is offline  
Old 02-08-2010, 04:52 AM
  #13  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 2,568
Default

Originally Posted by sns21
Better guns out there in both price ranges. Tikkas are built extremely cheap, they do shoot well and handle nicely. There are better rifles for the same price. Winchesters haven't been that great since '64. The new ones are much improved, but again better rifles in that price range too.
My Tika 25-06 shot MOA out of the box. After zeroing, I tried 5 different brands of manufacturer'a ammo in 3 different grains and they will all hit within 2 inches of bullseye at 100yds with no adjustments. Shooting the Federal vita shocks 117 gr, the gun shoots better than I can. Braced well, the holes are usually touching or mighty close.
rockytop is offline  
Old 02-09-2010, 10:17 PM
  #14  
Spike
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7
Default

What is cheap about the Tikka's? The one I bought for the wife was not cheap feeling and is extremely nice rifle...they are best rifle for the price.
Mobckhntr is offline  
Old 02-10-2010, 08:10 AM
  #15  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 124
Default

Didn't say Tikka's weren't good guns, just said they were made cheap. I have two myself, and both shoot well. They have polymer both schrouds, one action length, and I don't care for their synthetic stocks.
sns21 is offline  
Old 08-14-2010, 05:24 AM
  #16  
Spike
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 40
Default

Tikka is hard to beat for the money. They may not be pretty, but they will shoot as well as rifles costing more than twice as much.
joeky is offline  
Old 08-15-2010, 12:10 AM
  #17  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Warren County NJ USA
Posts: 3,899
Default

Tikka, at least you know who makes them.....They aren't a SAKO, but they are made by them

Winchester it seems every year someone else is making them, poor business, poor product....Like another member stated, Winchester was the way to go from 1964 and before. I have a pre-64 what a great rifle
BOWHUNTERCOP is offline  
Old 08-15-2010, 05:30 AM
  #18  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Western Nebraska
Posts: 3,393
Default

Originally Posted by vabyrd
holy crap, take the Winchester...

Yuppers.....agreed
Vapodog is offline  
Old 08-16-2010, 04:53 AM
  #19  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,329
Default

I don't even think there is a basis for comparision. The Winchester is a rifle and the Tika is a Wal-martitized Americans excuse for a gun.

Get the Winchester.

The poster above that says Winchester hasn't produced a good rifle since 64 is sadly mistaken. The FN M70 is among the best factory rifles ever produced.

Tom
statjunk is offline  
Old 08-16-2010, 08:05 AM
  #20  
Nontypical Buck
 
13pointjomc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NE Alabama
Posts: 1,060
Default

+1 Winchester M70
13pointjomc is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.