Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

What makes more sense ?

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-27-2009 | 03:56 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Spike
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Iceland
Default What makes more sense ?

I have a heavy barrel varmint rifle in .223 and standard rifles in 25-06 and 30-06. I would like to add to my collection a short action lightweight rifle in .243 or 260….which one would make more sense in my battery ?
konnari is offline  
Reply
Old 10-27-2009 | 04:06 AM
  #2  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,329
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

Seems like you have the bases covered so you're simply looking to lighten you're load. What do you mean by light weight?

Definitions vary. For example I think a 7lb rifle is light. Some guys are looking to shave a lb off that. So if you were looking to get into the 6lb range it may start to really depend. Recoil could be an issue.

Tom
statjunk is offline  
Reply
Old 10-27-2009 | 04:18 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Spike
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Iceland
Default

By light I mean 7lb + scope (with synthetic stock).…my standard rifles weigh 8 lb. + scope and have wooden stock.
konnari is offline  
Reply
Old 10-27-2009 | 11:05 PM
  #4  
skeeter 7MM's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,921
Likes: 0
From: Saskatchewan Canada
Default

Do you reload? If not the 260 is limiting OTC. Just some food for thought but have you considered a 7mm 08. Another possibility if you want SA and don't mind the thought of WSM and little more recoil in a light rig - 270wsm? Either would give you a little seperation from what you have already & can be found in lighter frames.

With a .223 and 2506 in your cabinet the .243 seem redundant to me! I like a little more spacing, that's all.

Last edited by skeeter 7MM; 10-27-2009 at 11:09 PM.
skeeter 7MM is offline  
Reply
Old 10-28-2009 | 01:26 PM
  #5  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,516
Likes: 0
From:
Default

I also think a .270 cal. ot 7mm may work out well for you. Good luck.
handloader1 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-2009 | 11:15 AM
  #6  
cjwink's Avatar
Typical Buck
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
From: From Texas but now reside in MS
Default

of the 243 and 260 I would go with the 243... But a 7mm08 in a Model 7 would fit nicely in there also.
cjwink is offline  
Reply
Old 10-30-2009 | 10:16 AM
  #7  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Default

7-08 Tikka T-3. Mine is around 6.4 lbs. with a nikon 2x7 monarch and talley's.
vabyrd is offline  
Reply
Old 10-30-2009 | 03:26 PM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Spike
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Iceland
Default

I really like the idea of a Tikka T-3 laminated stainless in 7mm-08. Still light and handy and much nicer stock than the plastic one which I don’t like, feels to cheap for my taste ! My buddy has one in 7mm-08 and its incredibly accurate…
konnari is offline  
Reply
Old 10-31-2009 | 05:57 PM
  #9  
Catus Magnus's Avatar
Typical Buck
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: NC
Default

you've already got bolt guns - get a Marlin 336!
Catus Magnus is offline  
Reply
Old 10-31-2009 | 06:18 PM
  #10  
bigbulls's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,679
Likes: 0
Default

Any cartridge that you purchase below a 30-06 is only going to be duplicating the performance of what you already have but in a slightly different package.

So, assuming that you aren't really looking for some performance advantage from the cartridge itself but rather just want a light weight rifle. I would look at the Remington model seven, Winchester model 70 feather weightor ultimate shadow, Tikka T3, Browning X-bolt, etc...
bigbulls is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.