Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
What makes more sense ? >

What makes more sense ?

Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

What makes more sense ?

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-27-2009, 03:56 AM
  #1  
Spike
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Iceland
Posts: 24
Default What makes more sense ?

I have a heavy barrel varmint rifle in .223 and standard rifles in 25-06 and 30-06. I would like to add to my collection a short action lightweight rifle in .243 or 260….which one would make more sense in my battery ?
konnari is offline  
Old 10-27-2009, 04:06 AM
  #2  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,329
Default

Seems like you have the bases covered so you're simply looking to lighten you're load. What do you mean by light weight?

Definitions vary. For example I think a 7lb rifle is light. Some guys are looking to shave a lb off that. So if you were looking to get into the 6lb range it may start to really depend. Recoil could be an issue.

Tom
statjunk is offline  
Old 10-27-2009, 04:18 AM
  #3  
Spike
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Iceland
Posts: 24
Default

By light I mean 7lb + scope (with synthetic stock).…my standard rifles weigh 8 lb. + scope and have wooden stock.
konnari is offline  
Old 10-27-2009, 11:05 PM
  #4  
Giant Nontypical
 
skeeter 7MM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 6,921
Default

Do you reload? If not the 260 is limiting OTC. Just some food for thought but have you considered a 7mm 08. Another possibility if you want SA and don't mind the thought of WSM and little more recoil in a light rig - 270wsm? Either would give you a little seperation from what you have already & can be found in lighter frames.

With a .223 and 2506 in your cabinet the .243 seem redundant to me! I like a little more spacing, that's all.

Last edited by skeeter 7MM; 10-27-2009 at 11:09 PM.
skeeter 7MM is offline  
Old 10-28-2009, 01:26 PM
  #5  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 3,516
Default

I also think a .270 cal. ot 7mm may work out well for you. Good luck.
handloader1 is offline  
Old 10-29-2009, 11:15 AM
  #6  
Typical Buck
 
cjwink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: From Texas but now reside in MS
Posts: 823
Default

of the 243 and 260 I would go with the 243... But a 7mm08 in a Model 7 would fit nicely in there also.
cjwink is offline  
Old 10-30-2009, 10:16 AM
  #7  
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 824
Default

7-08 Tikka T-3. Mine is around 6.4 lbs. with a nikon 2x7 monarch and talley's.
vabyrd is offline  
Old 10-30-2009, 03:26 PM
  #8  
Spike
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Iceland
Posts: 24
Default

I really like the idea of a Tikka T-3 laminated stainless in 7mm-08. Still light and handy and much nicer stock than the plastic one which I don’t like, feels to cheap for my taste ! My buddy has one in 7mm-08 and its incredibly accurate…
konnari is offline  
Old 10-31-2009, 05:57 PM
  #9  
Typical Buck
 
Catus Magnus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 501
Default

you've already got bolt guns - get a Marlin 336!
Catus Magnus is offline  
Old 10-31-2009, 06:18 PM
  #10  
Boone & Crockett
 
bigbulls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,679
Default

Any cartridge that you purchase below a 30-06 is only going to be duplicating the performance of what you already have but in a slightly different package.

So, assuming that you aren't really looking for some performance advantage from the cartridge itself but rather just want a light weight rifle. I would look at the Remington model seven, Winchester model 70 feather weightor ultimate shadow, Tikka T3, Browning X-bolt, etc...
bigbulls is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.