Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

My new gun

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-05-2009 | 06:10 PM
  #31  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 0
From: Rivesville, WV
Default

Below is a couple of picture of rifles with Picatinney rails. The rail in no way impedes the shells. And notice how much farther apart the rings are. That makes the mount considerably stronger. And because both rings are monunted on the same rail it takes the "torque" out of the scope. Look at the true tactical rifles. They all wear Picatinney's. Tom.






HEAD0001 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-06-2009 | 06:17 AM
  #32  
Centaur 1's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 0
From: Titusville Florida
Default

Originally Posted by HEAD0001
I looked at the picture again and I see what you mean about the back base hitting the bolt if you turn it around. The more I look at it the more I like the Picatinney rails I have went to on all my rifles. The rails are easier to install and put less torque on the scopes, while they are consideraly stronger.
The picatinny rails are definitely the way to go. The slots are wider than the Weaver bases so they use a larger diameter screw to clamp the rings to the base.
Centaur 1 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-06-2009 | 06:33 AM
  #33  
Pawildman's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,600
Likes: 0
From: S.W. Pa.-- Heart in North Central Pa. mountains-
Default

..........Hey Tom....Hate to tell you this, but the bolt is on the wrong side of the action.....
Pawildman is offline  
Reply
Old 10-07-2009 | 08:41 PM
  #34  
zrexpilot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,695
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Did some more shooting today.
I am impressed.
3 shot groups at 200 yds were in the 3/4" range, 5 shots were at 1 1/4 to 1 3/4 range
5 different loads, 3 shot great. the worst was 3" at 200yds
several one holers
burned 40 rounds. Didnt even shoot 100 yds

Last edited by zrexpilot; 10-07-2009 at 08:44 PM.
zrexpilot is offline  
Reply
Old 10-08-2009 | 06:42 PM
  #35  
triggertadpole's Avatar
Spike
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: monteagle tn
Default

i like that gun
triggertadpole is offline  
Reply
Old 10-09-2009 | 03:04 PM
  #36  
Spike
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by zrexpilot
ya I think the raill would be better and was actually thinking about going that way. A friend praised leupold rings and to tell you the truth I think theyre junk. I dont like the way the front twists on and very hard to get square, the rear is held by a small pinch in between those to screws , not very good in my opinion. The rear has windage adjustment coupled with the front spinning around, these were the hardest rings and bases to install and get all squared up and trued down the barrell. I wont buy these ever again. I thinkg the picanny rail would add to the tactial look of this rifle, do you have enough room to load shells or does it hinder it some.
Z said he cant stand that setup he also said that after watching his gun rollover it shot perfectly fine,im the friend that praises that setup & just ask him what kind of groups this entire setup is holding at 200yrds. ur welcome z
javeline is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.