Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
Minimum Energy for whitetails... >

Minimum Energy for whitetails...

Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

Minimum Energy for whitetails...

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-29-2009, 05:35 AM
  #31  
Nontypical Buck
 
DannyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 2,414
Default

My assumptions, true or false, of what kills an animal is a bullet or arrow making a hole in the heart which damages a vital organ resulting in death. A bullet or arrow slicing through the lungs filling them with blood resulting in suffocation/death.

That being said, there is obviously an amount of energy needed to allow the bullet or arrow to pierce the skin, the muscle and ultimately the vital organ that will eventually result in the death of the animal.

I'm just not sure what that amount of energy is, I don't claim to understand alot about KE or exactly what it is. However, I began hunting 5 years ago. Right away i heard about this 1,000lb number that is supposed to be a minimum standard. I've always just used it and accepted it a a minimum especially when i was trying to choose a particular cartridge for my first gun for me and my daughter (thank you Rebel Hog)
Now, I'm trying to understand that number and why it is set at that particular figure. There is a lot of experience on these forums. Zrex and Eldeguello have always had great info. In fact Zrex is probably responsible for my 243 purchase (although he doesn't know it). And since i just bought a reloader kit i'm sure i will be watching Eldeguello's posts more often

Thanks lots for the responses so far

Last edited by DannyD; 07-29-2009 at 07:45 AM.
DannyD is offline  
Old 07-29-2009, 07:35 AM
  #32  
Boone & Crockett
 
falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Comance county, OK
Posts: 11,408
Default

Bullet placement is everything. However, the elusive search for a magic bullet that will turn a gut shot into a bang flop every time continues.

If kinetic energy is everything how in the world did my brother, our friends and I ever kill lots of deer with our .25/20 and .32/20 guns in the early 50s in WV? Those guns did not make 1000 foot pounds at the muzzle. We killed those deer because we put the bullets in the right place.

I routinely kill big wild hogs with a .22 magnum and FMJ bullets. Those hogs die because they are hit in the right place. Once saw a guy gutshoot a huge hog with a .300 Win Mag and someones spiffy premium 180 grain bullet. That big sow never missed a beat and just kept on trucking for about one-half mile. We jumped the wounded hog in a plum thicket and the guy gut shot her again. So we had another chase before the hog died.
falcon is offline  
Old 07-29-2009, 02:06 PM
  #33  
Nontypical Buck
 
zrexpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,695
Default

Originally Posted by DannyD
My assumptions, true or false, of what kills an animal is a bullet or arrow making a hole in the heart which damages a vital organ resulting in death. A bullet or arrow slicing through the lungs filling them with blood resulting in suffocation/death.

That being said, there is obviously an amount of energy needed to allow the bullet or arrow to pierce the skin, the muscle and ultimately the vital organ that will eventually result in the death of the animal.

I'm just not sure what that amount of energy is, I don't claim to understand alot about KE or exactly what it is. However, I began hunting 5 years ago. Right away i heard about this 1,000lb number that is supposed to be a minimum standard. I've always just used it and accepted it a a minimum especially when i was trying to choose a particular cartridge for my first gun for me and my daughter (thank you Rebel Hog)
Now, I'm trying to understand that number and why it is set at that particular figure. There is a lot of experience on these forums. Zrex and Eldeguello have always had great info. In fact Zrex is probably responsible for my 243 purchase (although he doesn't know it). And since i just bought a reloader kit i'm sure i will be watching Eldeguello's posts more often

Thanks lots for the responses so far


You have it right, its the hole you put in the animal. 2500ft/lb of energy slipped between the spine and and the lungs will not kill a deer. He will live another day. 600lb of energy through the lungs will let the air out and the life of a deer.
A .22 lr with 100 or so ft/lb of energy to the heart of a deer will kill it everytime. Just so you know a .22lr out penetrates a .223 or so I've read

ps how you liking that .243

Last edited by zrexpilot; 07-29-2009 at 02:34 PM.
zrexpilot is offline  
Old 08-11-2009, 05:01 AM
  #34  
Nontypical Buck
 
DannyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 2,414
Default

Originally Posted by zrexpilot
You have it right, its the hole you put in the animal. 2500ft/lb of energy slipped between the spine and and the lungs will not kill a deer. He will live another day. 600lb of energy through the lungs will let the air out and the life of a deer.
A .22 lr with 100 or so ft/lb of energy to the heart of a deer will kill it everytime. Just so you know a .22lr out penetrates a .223 or so I've read

ps how you liking that .243



Liking it lots thank you. I've killed a few deer with it. My buddies young son uses it to hunt. Everyone that i go to the range with eventually shoots it and loves the gun. No recoil, accurate, effective. What more could i ask
DannyD is offline  
Old 08-11-2009, 07:26 AM
  #35  
Nontypical Buck
 
zrexpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,695
Default

I sold my last .243 a year or 2 ago. Its was a bull barrell and was just to darn heavy.
I have been using my NEF .22 hornet since then but I came across a 7-08 barrell for it, pretty cheap so I bought it. I want to see what all the fuss is about with the 7-08. I started handloading some time back And I found some loads for the 7-08 that puts the 120 gr pill a bit faster and flatter than even a hot .243 load. So I am a little excited about it. I will eventually get another .243 though, it really is a shaweeeet gun.
zrexpilot is offline  
Old 08-11-2009, 07:57 AM
  #36  
Boone & Crockett
 
ipscshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 12,040
Default

Originally Posted by zrexpilot
I sold my last .243 a year or 2 ago. Its was a bull barrell and was just to darn heavy.
I have been using my NEF .22 hornet since then but I came across a 7-08 barrell for it, pretty cheap so I bought it. I want to see what all the fuss is about with the 7-08. I started handloading some time back And I found some loads for the 7-08 that puts the 120 gr pill a bit faster and flatter than even a hot .243 load. So I am a little excited about it. I will eventually get another .243 though, it really is a shaweeeet gun.
I handled a 7-08 yesterday at Academy, here in Houston. I was kinda hoping they'd have a Marlin XS-7 in that chambering. They've got Remington 700 ADL's on sale for $439... They had a couple of 700's and an XS-7 them in .243. I think the XS-7 was only $289, and I've been hearing really good things about them...
ipscshooter is offline  
Old 08-11-2009, 08:00 AM
  #37  
Boone & Crockett
 
ipscshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 12,040
Default

Originally Posted by zrexpilot
You have it right, its the hole you put in the animal. 2500ft/lb of energy slipped between the spine and and the lungs will not kill a deer. He will live another day.
The buck I shot last year had that exact injury... healed up bullet wound passing just under the spine. Looked like it was probably at least a .308 cal.
ipscshooter is offline  
Old 08-17-2009, 05:55 AM
  #38  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: MISSOURI
Posts: 1,157
Default

I must be really dumb I just point my .270wsm or my .300wm or my 45/70 at a deer and pull the trigger and the deer sometime drops and some times runs but there is blood trail and follow it to the deer!
DANTHEHUNTER is offline  
Old 08-17-2009, 06:05 AM
  #39  
Nontypical Buck
 
zrexpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,695
Default

I must be dumber, I point my .22 hornet at deer and hogs (23 to date) and not one has taken a step.

Got this one saturday night. nuther DRT

zrexpilot is offline  
Old 08-17-2009, 08:20 AM
  #40  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: VT USA
Posts: 15
Default

Originally Posted by ColoradoElk
If hunting in Colorado and maintaining possession of your rifle, pickup and other gear is a goal of yours, I'd suggest keeping with the 1,000 ft/lbs at 100 yards. Otherwise, you are a POACHER.

1. CENTERFIRE RIFLES


a.
Must be min. .24 caliber (6 mm).
b.


Must have min. a 16-inch barrel and be at least 26 inches long.
c.


If semiautomatic, they can hold max. of 6 rounds in the magazine and
chamber combined.
d.


Must use expanding bullets that weigh min. 70 grains for deer, pronghorn
and bear, 85 grains for elk and moose, and have an impact energy (at
100 yds.) of 1,000-ft. pounds as rated by manufacturer.
e.


It is illegal to hunt game birds, small game mammals or furbearers with
a centerfire rifle larger than .23 caliber during regular rifle deer and elk seasons
Wof I-25, without an unfilled deer or elk license for the season.

That's kind of an odd standard. Legally, you couldn't use a hard cast 45/70 bullet in the range of 400-500 as it does not expand, even though such rounds dropped uncountable Bison in the 19th century.
JamminJay is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.