Kimber Montana in 7 WSM
#1
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 6,471
Kimber Montana in 7 WSM
I had one Kimber that had a problem and the customer service was top notch. I was considering a Colt Light Rifle but what would it do that the Montana could not do. I might have to revisit Kimbers. Anyone have one and if so what are their likes and dislikes. I guess I could live without the floorplate.
#2
Typical Buck
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 604
RE: Kimber Montana in 7 WSM
I shoot quite often with a buddy that has a 300 WSM, 338 Federal and 308 kimber Montana. All three shoot right at 1" moa. The 7mm WSM in a Montana with a Burris short mag scope is the set up I am plotting (against my wife) to get. I know the 7mm WSM is not real popular but I think it is the best of the 7mm cartridges when you consider ballistics and the advantages of the short mag action. The Montana rifles I have fired have really impressed me with their accuracy and handling.
#4
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 6,471
RE: Kimber Montana in 7 WSM
. I know the 7mm WSM is not real popular but I think it is the best of the 7mm cartridges when you consider ballistics and the advantages of the short mag action.
#8
RE: Kimber Montana in 7 WSM
Well the rem 700 action is copied andused by a ton of benchrest shooters, kinda the goto.
While I'm not disputing a controlled feed can be accurate, I think it takes more work to make a controlled feed very accurate than a push feed.
It could be the flip of a coin with accuracy on a factory rifle these days I'm not sure, but to me controlled feed is for big bore dangerous game setups where reliability is the crucial ingredient, not accuracy.
And in a 7mm WSM, I think we're talking accuracy, not dangerous game reliability.
But if someone else has the kimber montanas....I'd be curious to know what type of groups they're getting. 1.5" ? sub MOA? less than a 1/2MOA?
In addition, in a recent gun test, they tested the new model 70, worst or at the bottom of the list in the accuracy department, they probably tested the kimber, should relook, but none the less, only further reinstates the controlled feed vs. push argument.
Personally I expect sub moa out of such calibers, so if I was talking 1.5" with a controlled feed, vs sub MOA with a push, id take a push hands down. And why not? there's no reason to HAVE a controlled feed in this setup, less you're planning to hunt lions?
While I'm not disputing a controlled feed can be accurate, I think it takes more work to make a controlled feed very accurate than a push feed.
It could be the flip of a coin with accuracy on a factory rifle these days I'm not sure, but to me controlled feed is for big bore dangerous game setups where reliability is the crucial ingredient, not accuracy.
And in a 7mm WSM, I think we're talking accuracy, not dangerous game reliability.
But if someone else has the kimber montanas....I'd be curious to know what type of groups they're getting. 1.5" ? sub MOA? less than a 1/2MOA?
In addition, in a recent gun test, they tested the new model 70, worst or at the bottom of the list in the accuracy department, they probably tested the kimber, should relook, but none the less, only further reinstates the controlled feed vs. push argument.
Personally I expect sub moa out of such calibers, so if I was talking 1.5" with a controlled feed, vs sub MOA with a push, id take a push hands down. And why not? there's no reason to HAVE a controlled feed in this setup, less you're planning to hunt lions?
ORIGINAL: trailer
How so ???
ORIGINAL: salukipv1
I tend to think of push feeds as more accurate than controlled feeds
I tend to think of push feeds as more accurate than controlled feeds
#9
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 6,471
RE: Kimber Montana in 7 WSM
Well the rem 700 action is copied andused by a ton of benchrest shooters, kinda the goto.
It could be the flip of a coin with accuracy on a factory rifle these days I'm not sure, but to me controlled feed is for big bore dangerous game setups where reliability is the crucial ingredient, not accuracy.
Or on an Elk Hunt outside Yellowstone 20 miles from nowhere where whena shot rings out it is ringingthe dinner bell for a Grizzly. Yeah I want a remington in my hands at that moment.
But if someone else has the kimber montanas....I'd be curious to know what type of groups they're getting. 1.5" ? sub MOA? less than a 1/2MOA?
In addition, in a recent gun test, they tested the new model 70, worst or at the bottom of the list in the accuracy department, they probably tested the kimber, should relook, but none the less, only further reinstates the controlled feed vs. push argument.
Here is a target that I gleaned from another site of the rifle in questions accuracy potential
#10
Typical Buck
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 604
RE: Kimber Montana in 7 WSM
But if someone else has the kimber montanas....I'd be curious to know what type of groups they're getting. 1.5" ? sub MOA? less than a 1/2MOA?
In addition, in a recent gun test, they tested the new model 70, worst or at the bottom of the list in the accuracy department, they probably tested the kimber, should relook, but none the less, only further reinstates the controlled feed vs. push argument.
In addition, in a recent gun test, they tested the new model 70, worst or at the bottom of the list in the accuracy department, they probably tested the kimber, should relook, but none the less, only further reinstates the controlled feed vs. push argument.
http://www.kimberamerica.com/rifles/africa-alaska/
If you belive the magazines it claims to be the most accurate rifle ever tested by American Rifleman. I do not see any difference in the push feed or controlled round action when the round is chambered and bolt locked that would give one an advantage. Push feeds are supposed to be less expensive to manufacture and controlled round feed is not of benefit when bench shooting so why pay the extra money for controlled round feed.