Court rules in favor of Second Amendment gun right
06-26-2008, 08:36 AM
#1
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 383
Court rules in favor of Second Amendment gun right
Great news!!!
WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Americans have a right to own guns for self-defense and hunting, the justices' first major pronouncement on gun rights in U.S. history.
This Story The court's 5-4 ruling struck down the District of Columbia's 32-year-old ban on handguns as incompatible with gun rights under the Second Amendment. The decision went further than even the Bush administration wanted, but probably leaves most firearms laws intact.
The court had not conclusively interpreted the Second Amendment since its ratification in 1791. The amendment reads: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
The basic issue for the justices was whether the amendment protects an individual's right to own guns no matter what, or whether that right is somehow tied to service in a state militia.
Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for four colleagues, said the Constitution does not permit "the absolute prohibition of handguns held and used for self-defense in the home."
In dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that the majority "would have us believe that over 200 years ago, the Framers made a choice to limit the tools available to elected officials wishing to regulate civilian uses of weapons."
He said such evidence "is nowhere to be found."
Joining Scalia were Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas. The other dissenters were Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and David Souter.
The capital's gun law was among the nation's strictest.
Dick Anthony Heller, 66, an armed security guard, sued the District after it rejected his application to keep a handgun at his home for protection in the same Capitol Hill neighborhood as the court.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled in Heller's favor and struck down Washington's handgun ban, saying the Constitution guarantees Americans the right to own guns and that a total prohibition on handguns is not compatible with that right.
The issue caused a split within the Bush administration. Vice President Dick Cheney supported the appeals court ruling, but others in the administration feared it could lead to the undoing of other gun regulations, including a federal law restricting sales of machine guns. Other laws keep felons from buying guns and provide for an instant background check.
Scalia said nothing in Thursday's ruling should "cast doubt on long-standing prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons or the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings."
The law adopted by Washington's city council in 1976 bars residents from owning handguns unless they had one before the law took effect. Shotguns and rifles may be kept in homes, if they are registered, kept unloaded and either disassembled or equipped with trigger locks.
Opponents of the law have said it prevents residents from defending themselves. The Washington government says no one would be prosecuted for a gun law violation in cases of self-defense.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/26/AR2008062600615.html
WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Americans have a right to own guns for self-defense and hunting, the justices' first major pronouncement on gun rights in U.S. history.
This Story The court's 5-4 ruling struck down the District of Columbia's 32-year-old ban on handguns as incompatible with gun rights under the Second Amendment. The decision went further than even the Bush administration wanted, but probably leaves most firearms laws intact.
The court had not conclusively interpreted the Second Amendment since its ratification in 1791. The amendment reads: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
The basic issue for the justices was whether the amendment protects an individual's right to own guns no matter what, or whether that right is somehow tied to service in a state militia.
Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for four colleagues, said the Constitution does not permit "the absolute prohibition of handguns held and used for self-defense in the home."
In dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that the majority "would have us believe that over 200 years ago, the Framers made a choice to limit the tools available to elected officials wishing to regulate civilian uses of weapons."
He said such evidence "is nowhere to be found."
Joining Scalia were Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas. The other dissenters were Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and David Souter.
The capital's gun law was among the nation's strictest.
Dick Anthony Heller, 66, an armed security guard, sued the District after it rejected his application to keep a handgun at his home for protection in the same Capitol Hill neighborhood as the court.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled in Heller's favor and struck down Washington's handgun ban, saying the Constitution guarantees Americans the right to own guns and that a total prohibition on handguns is not compatible with that right.
The issue caused a split within the Bush administration. Vice President Dick Cheney supported the appeals court ruling, but others in the administration feared it could lead to the undoing of other gun regulations, including a federal law restricting sales of machine guns. Other laws keep felons from buying guns and provide for an instant background check.
Scalia said nothing in Thursday's ruling should "cast doubt on long-standing prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons or the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings."
The law adopted by Washington's city council in 1976 bars residents from owning handguns unless they had one before the law took effect. Shotguns and rifles may be kept in homes, if they are registered, kept unloaded and either disassembled or equipped with trigger locks.
Opponents of the law have said it prevents residents from defending themselves. The Washington government says no one would be prosecuted for a gun law violation in cases of self-defense.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/26/AR2008062600615.html
06-26-2008, 08:44 AM
#2
Boone & Crockett
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Comance county, OK
Posts: 11,408
RE: Court rules in favor of Second Amendment gun right
From SCOTUSBlog:
.
Tom Goldstein - Quoting the syllabus: The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditional lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home
06-26-2008, 10:52 AM
#6
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Where the ducks don't come no more
Posts: 4,420
RE: Court rules in favor of Second Amendment gun right
ORIGINAL: Colorado Luckydog
When they outlaw guns...I'll be an outlaw!
When they outlaw guns...I'll be an outlaw!
So when that happens... none of us will be American's anymore either. (no offense to our international members intended here).
06-26-2008, 10:53 AM
#7
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,695
RE: Court rules in favor of Second Amendment gun right
Lets hope the liberals can put this to rest and get on with whats the real problem in society. Criminals ! Bring back public hanging's. Quit putting people in jail longer for drug charges than murder. Jails are loaded with drug users but murderers and rapists go free in 7 years.
I am always asked " you keep your guns loaded " Duh, what good is a gun if its not loaded, a frying pan is more lethal than an unloaded gun.
Maybe there is hope.
God bless America !
I am always asked " you keep your guns loaded " Duh, what good is a gun if its not loaded, a frying pan is more lethal than an unloaded gun.
Maybe there is hope.
God bless America !
06-26-2008, 11:52 AM
#8
Join Date: May 2008
Location:
Posts: 499
RE: Court rules in favor of Second Amendment gun right
Crime is is a lucrative cash cow for legislators, lawyers and judges...
Not to mention job security for law enforcement, corrections and many goverment agencies.
Crime will never die........
Not to mention job security for law enforcement, corrections and many goverment agencies.
Crime will never die........
06-26-2008, 11:57 AM
#9
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,329
RE: Court rules in favor of Second Amendment gun right
ORIGINAL: Rifle Loony
Crime is is a lucrative cash cow for legislators, lawyers and judges...
Not to mention job security for law enforcement, corrections and many goverment agencies.
Crime will never die........
Crime is is a lucrative cash cow for legislators, lawyers and judges...
Not to mention job security for law enforcement, corrections and many goverment agencies.
Crime will never die........
Tom
06-26-2008, 12:20 PM
#10
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,918
RE: Court rules in favor of Second Amendment gun right
That's great news and it's been a long time coming. Thank God there's still judges with some common sense.I hope this issue can finally be put to rest once and for all.
