Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
 .338-300 win mag? vs. 338 win mag? >

.338-300 win mag? vs. 338 win mag?

Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

.338-300 win mag? vs. 338 win mag?

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-10-2008, 05:17 PM
  #1  
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
 
salukipv1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: IL
Posts: 6,575
Default .338-300 win mag? vs. 338 win mag?

I noticed the .338 win mag is noticeably shorter than the .300 win mag, and it was explained to me that this is to avoid someone using a .300 win mag round in a .338 win mag rifle.

Does anyone know how much extra velocity the .338 would gain if it were full length as is the .300 win mag? 50fps? 100fps? 200fps? more fps?


salukipv1 is offline  
Old 04-11-2008, 06:52 AM
  #2  
Spike
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Iceland
Posts: 24
Default RE: .338-300 win mag? vs. 338 win mag?


Quote: “to avoid someone using a .300 win mag round in a .338 win mag rifle” This is false….

Introduced in 1963, the 300 win. mag. differs from earlier Winchester magnums in having a slightly longer case. The stated reason for increased case length, combined with an unusually short neck, was to increase case capacity and therefore ballistic potential. While this had merit, performance difference between this and the wildcat 30-338 (338 Winchester Magnum necked to 30-caliber) is quite modest. Motivation for this design can best be understood by recognizing that Norma introduced the 308 Norma Magnum, a standard 30-caliber magnum, in 1960. Likely, this preempted Winchester's development of a 30-caliber magnum. Specifically, had Norma not introduced their version in 1960, Winchester would probably have offered a 30-caliber magnum by about 1961. Almost certainly, that number would have been identical to the wildcat 30-338.
konnari is offline  
Old 04-11-2008, 07:38 AM
  #3  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 6,471
Default RE: .338-300 win mag? vs. 338 win mag?

noticed the .338 win mag is noticeably shorter than the .300 win mag, and it was explained to me that this is to avoid someone using a .300 win mag round in a .338 win mag rifle.
The stated reason for increased case length, combined with an unusually short neck, was to increase case capacity and therefore ballistic potential. While this had merit, performance difference between this and the wildcat 30-338 (338 Winchester Magnum necked to 30-caliber) is quite modest. Motivation for this design can best be understood by recognizing that Norma introduced the 308 Norma Magnum, a standard 30-caliber magnum, in 1960
I think I explained this to you last week in another post but glad Konnari posted the same thing .. Norma got the jump on winchester...A 338 bullet in a 300 winchester case would be a bad idea. Recoil wise there is not a lot of neck to grip a heavy bullet .
oldelkhunter is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.