Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
 .243 vs .243 WSSM - Which and why? >

.243 vs .243 WSSM - Which and why?

Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

.243 vs .243 WSSM - Which and why?

Old 12-17-2007, 11:09 AM
  #11  
Spike
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Kent County, MD
Posts: 42
Default RE: .243 vs .243 WSSM - Which and why?

I only use my .243 on varmints with my model 70 heavy barrel, it doesquite well on long ranges and is accurate. Having never shot a 243 wssm i cant compare, but not many rounds will compare to the .243 for all around shooting.
Kent Co. Boy is offline  
Old 12-17-2007, 11:30 AM
  #12  
Typical Buck
 
johnnybravoo77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Montrose, MI
Posts: 713
Default RE: .243 vs .243 WSSM - Which and why?

I shot a Ruger m77 in 243up until last deer season. I have since passed it on to my little brother. It is great round to shoot! I beleive you are not gaining anything with the wssm. I was shooting 95 grain Winchester ballistic silvertips, which also comes in the wssm, your only getting about 100fps more than the reg. 243. There isalso more ammo choices for the regular 243.
johnnybravoo77 is offline  
Old 12-17-2007, 02:47 PM
  #13  
Typical Buck
 
cjwink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: From Texas but now reside in MS
Posts: 823
Default RE: .243 vs .243 WSSM - Which and why?

Go with the 243.. Look at the 85 Grain BTHP from Federal.. Great cartridge for deer and varmits.. It matches anything the 243 WSSM can toss out..
cjwink is offline  
Old 12-17-2007, 04:17 PM
  #14  
Giant Nontypical
 
JagMagMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Port Neches, Texas
Posts: 5,514
Default RE: .243 vs .243 WSSM - Which and why?

Since I've never shot the WSSM, I can't give any advice on how it performs. Judging by the "paper" comparison, I totally agree with the others! At half the price for the same ballistics the .243 is the way to go! Plus the fact that finding the double priced ammo may be the biggest downfall! The .243 has been a top seller foralmost 50 years! Some of the newbies will be dead in less than ten years!
JagMagMan is offline  
Old 12-17-2007, 07:35 PM
  #15  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Baileysville, WV
Posts: 2,925
Default RE: .243 vs .243 WSSM - Which and why?

Id think this 243 wssm will be one of the new ones that absolutely aint gonna make it...theres nothing there..a short action replacing a short action with very little extra performance for twice the money...lol...screw that!
Doe Dumper is offline  
Old 12-17-2007, 08:06 PM
  #16  
Boone & Crockett
 
ipscshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 12,035
Default RE: .243 vs .243 WSSM - Which and why?

I think it's unanimous. The .243 WSSM appears to be the answer to a question that no one ever asked...
ipscshooter is offline  
Old 12-17-2007, 08:50 PM
  #17  
Giant Nontypical
 
jeepkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ****ifornia
Posts: 5,052
Default RE: .243 vs .243 WSSM - Which and why?

ORIGINAL: ipscshooter

I think it's unanimous. The .243 WSSM appears to be the answer to a question that no one ever asked...
Except for AR shooters.
jeepkid is offline  
Old 12-17-2007, 08:58 PM
  #18  
Spike
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 51
Default RE: .243 vs .243 WSSM - Which and why?

Thanks for the advice, guys. I guess I liked the looks of the wssm round, but as everone has said, that's about all that's different from the old standby. And also, it looks to me like given the lack of advantages of the wssm, they should be selling at bargain basement prices, which they aren't.

I handload so the ammo isn't a really big deal one way or the other, but again the cost of brass is higher so another strike against the WSSM. As everyone has said, it's a solution looking for a problem. Also can't see the point of the .223 WSSM. Um, why not just by a .22-250?

Grouse

The Famous Grouse is offline  
Old 12-17-2007, 09:54 PM
  #19  
Boone & Crockett
 
ipscshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 12,035
Default RE: .243 vs .243 WSSM - Which and why?

ORIGINAL: jeepkid

ORIGINAL: ipscshooter

I think it's unanimous. The .243 WSSM appears to be the answer to a question that no one ever asked...
Except for AR shooters.
DPMS makes a very nice AR chambered for .243 Win.... May be my next deer rifle.
ipscshooter is offline  
Old 12-18-2007, 06:11 AM
  #20  
Boone & Crockett
 
bronko22000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 12,745
Default RE: .243 vs .243 WSSM - Which and why?

I don't have a 243 Win anymore. But I've used it for years on deer with great success. And loaded with the 75 gr bullets it should be a great varmint round. I've also never shot a 243 WSSM but from what I've heard it is rough chambering a round from the magazine due to ist sharp shoulder. But again that is only what I've read and not from experience. In your case however, this wouldn't be a problem in a dog town.
IMO - I'd go with the old std 243.
bronko22000 is online now  

Quick Reply: .243 vs .243 WSSM - Which and why?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.