I am thinking of buying eithera Sako 75 ss or a Weatherby Accumark in 270 win. any thoughts or experience with either? any help would be appreciated chad

Experience with both. Definatley go with the 75SS. Only thing I like better about the accumark is the stock has much more quality than the cheap stock with the 75SS. But I have had some issues with weatherby, and none with Sako.

bigcountry, do you have any experience with a Sako Fiberclass also in 270 win. do they have detatchable mag. or hindged floorplate ? chad

I have a 75 and 2 Weatherby's,the Sako is a better shooter...

The Sako 75 has detachable magazine. I like the older Sako rifles with the grey synthetic stock. The last Sako 75 rifles with the black synthetic stocks and green rubber grip areas are made of a different material and don’t sound as solid as the grey one...

You couldn't give me 2 accumarks for my 75's I mean you could but they would be on Broker the next day and I would look up another 75

I have fired both though not in 270win.I much prefer the Sako.

Not BC but
I owned a Sako fiberclass and it is not a 75 but an AV ..Came from the factory with a Mcmillan stock and a hinged floorplate. Best Darn 30-06 I ever owned but in a really weak moment I traded it for 2 rifles in a browning browning collection. If you can find one and they are out there you have quite the gun provided it hasn't been dorked with and abused ...I came across one 2 months ago and reached for the checkbook without putting on my eyeglassesbut when I did backed out of the deal.

Sako...... My motto on Roys....just say no

I also agree that the Sako 75 is the way to go. If you dislike the stock, get a McMillan aftermarket one.