Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

.270 or a 7mm

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-28-2007 | 05:10 PM
  #21  
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Default RE: .270 or a 7mm

.30-06
Hunting the North is offline  
Reply
Old 10-28-2007 | 05:34 PM
  #22  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: .270 or a 7mm

Guys, you are quibbling over very little here if we are talking about deer sized animals. I had a hard time figuring out what you were all talking about here as there are many many 7mm cartridges. Usually 7mm means 7mm Mauser and in that case there really is no discussion as these 2 calibers are essentially equal.

However, El"d" brought this to light and IMHO, the 270 can't come close to the 7MM Rem Mag for Elk/Moose sized animals that weighs triple a WTD. The 7mag simply has the terminal foot pounds of energy that a huge animals require for a clean kill. The 270 for deer.......the 7MM Rem Mag for bigger or both.

IMHO the 7Mag has not lost it's luster to the new Short Magnums as the 7Mag is the leader in ammo sales for this catagory year after year for a reason. IMHO, the 7 Mag and the '06 are the kings of the hill. Regards, Rick.
48thguns is offline  
Reply
Old 10-28-2007 | 05:50 PM
  #23  
DM
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,813
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: .270 or a 7mm

When I ground away the entire cross section,the jackets looked identical.As to the alloys and hardness,I can't say,but I can tell you that the ballistic point did not shed it's core even though it is not bonded.And according to Nosler,the difference between the two is that the accubond has a bonded core.They mentioned nothing about alloys or hardness.
Then they "probably" are the same...

I've had numerousBT bullets come apart and shed their jackets... Mostly in 165's fired out of a 30-06 on caribou and deer. They still penetrated fairly well, but none the less, it did happen often.

I haven't used any accubonds, as i find guilding metal doesn't make the best jacket material for "bonded" bullets, at least not when when hitting the heavy bones in big animials. That doesn't mean they are junk, it just means they are not "my" preference for what i'd use a bonded bullet for...

DM
DM is offline  
Reply
Old 10-28-2007 | 07:07 PM
  #24  
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,667
Likes: 0
From: fort mcmurray alberta canada
Default RE: .270 or a 7mm

Guys, you are quibbling over very little here if we are talking about deer sized animals.
Apparently you didn't read the original post.

I am looking into hunting deer, antelope and elk at this time.
We are talking Elk as well as deer.

Usually 7mm means 7mm Mauser and in that case there really is no discussion as these 2 calibers are essentially equal.
Actually,when most people say 7mm,they are referring to the most common 7mm,the 7mmremmag.
stubblejumper is offline  
Reply
Old 10-28-2007 | 10:09 PM
  #25  
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Hillsbough N.c
Default RE: .270 or a 7mm

I Use A Ruger M77 in the 270.cal. Very good cal for Mid Sized Deer. I Do want to try the 7mm rem mag and also the 338.cal for black bear here in n.c
redneck781928 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-28-2007 | 10:10 PM
  #26  
skeeter 7MM's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,921
Likes: 0
From: Saskatchewan Canada
Default RE: .270 or a 7mm

I have used both for up to moosebut without hesitation for larger then deer the 7mm rem mag is the better choice.7mm rem mag is still my current CF choice whenhunting lopers to moose here in Saskatchewan.

I have never experienced an NBT blow up in countless harvests, 150gr continues to be my bullet of choice in the 7mm rem mag for lope, wt and mulie's. When hunting elk and moose I switch to a more robust bullet, which currently is the Barnes TSX - 5 and counting so far with this combo.
skeeter 7MM is offline  
Reply
Old 10-28-2007 | 10:10 PM
  #27  
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Hillsbough N.c
Default RE: .270 or a 7mm

Hey ya"ll is the 7mm a flat shooting cal?
redneck781928 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-2007 | 02:01 PM
  #28  
DannyD's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,414
Likes: 0
From: West Virginia
Default RE: .270 or a 7mm

Guys,
I bought a 7MMmag this past off season. I've been sighting in the Remington Coreloks with very good success up until now. Are you saying that at close range, say under 50 yards, that these bullets will basically disintigrate after very little penetration on a whitetail?
If so, I need to start sighting in some new ammo
DannyD is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-2007 | 03:34 PM
  #29  
JagMagMan's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,514
Likes: 0
From: Port Neches, Texas
Default RE: .270 or a 7mm

ORIGINAL: DannyD

Guys,
I bought a 7MMmag this past off season. I've been sighting in the Remington Coreloks with very good success up until now. Are you saying that at close range, say under 50 yards, that these bullets will basically disintigrate after very little penetration on a whitetail?
If so, I need to start sighting in some new ammo
Depends on what you are shooting at! I have not had any 7MM RM's "disentegrate!" I have had the heavier bullets fail to expand on deer sized game at shorter ranges!
If you are hunting deer, I'd use a 139 gr.
JagMagMan is offline  
Reply
Old 10-29-2007 | 04:12 PM
  #30  
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Default RE: .270 or a 7mm

I have both, even though my 7mm is a saum. I like them both, but I would have to give the edge to the 7mm because of bullet choice. However a good 140 or 150 gr. 270 will do as well as any.
270 bdl is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.