HuntingNet.com Forums - .308 or .270?

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)

- Guns (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/guns-10/)

- - .308 or .270? (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/guns/200889-308-270-a.html)

RE: .308 or .270?

The 270 because the balistic coefficient is better and if you're even thinking of getting a 308 then you might as well get the 30-06 in my opinion.

RE: .308 or .270?

Quote:

"....if you're even thinking of getting a 308 then you might as well get the 30-06 in my opinion."

For hunting game more robust than deer I wholeheartedly agree....
Deer size critters and underand for target shooting, the .308 is a wonderful cartridge.
================================================== ==

From a prior note:

Quote:

ORIGINAL: EKM

After six pages of debate/discussionregarding 270 vs. 308 andthe whole works may be tossed aside for a 30-30?

What was the point in the first place?
Something isn't right.

I don't see what is not right. The original poster came here looking for information, which he received, and based on that information has decided to look at other options that may or may not suit his needs just as well. To my way of thinking, this is what it is all about, sharing info and experiences with fellow hunters and shooters.

Kinda like going to a pet shop to buy a puppy, just gotta choose between a golden retriever and a golden lab.... then end up going home with a pet turtle instead.

RE: .308 or .270?

Quote:

ORIGINAL: EKM

Kinda like going to a pet shop to buy a puppy, just gotta choose between a golden retriever and a golden lab.... then end up going home with a pet turtle instead.

LOL, good analogy, EKM.

RE: .308 or .270?

BOTH CALIBERS ARE GOOD,THEY BOTH ARE DEPENDABLE BUT FOR LONGER DISTANCES TAKE THE 308.

RE: .308 or .270?

Quote:

BUT FOR LONGER DISTANCES TAKE THE 308.

I am really curious why you would say take a 308 Win over a 270 Win for longer distances. The 270 is going to be flatter and carry more energy than a 308 with common loadings.

RE: .308 or .270?

Few deer hunters shoot long distances, unless, of course, being out West, but there's a reason that snipers use the .308 and not the .270, don't know what it is, but I trust their judgement.

RE: .308 or .270?

Quote:

ORIGINAL: younggun308

Few deer hunters shoot long distances, unless, of course, being out West, but there's a reason that snipers use the .308 and not the .270, don't know what it is, but I trust their judgement.

This is just a guess, but, I'd bet the choice was made based on logistics, not ballistics. The .308 has been a standard military round since the '50's. The .270 has not. Sniper rifles of the past have pretty much been GI rifles with a scope mounted. I doubt that the snipers had much of a choice. I don't know whether this is still the case, or whether snipers might now be given more leeway in their cartridge choice.

RE: .308 or .270?

Quote:

ORIGINAL: M77man

The 270 because the balistic coefficient is better

That kinda depends on which bullet weight/bullet designyou're using for each cartridge, doesn't it? Just a guess, but, wouldn't a 165 gr. boattail .308 have a better ballistic coefficient than a 150 gr. soft point .277?

RE: .308 or .270?

But all those "tactical" bolt-actions are in .308, and consumers have a choice.

I wonder if Wikipedia knows, I doubt it.

RE: .308 or .270?

Quote:

ORIGINAL: younggun308

But all those "tactical" bolt-actions are in .308, and consumers have a choice.

I wonder if Wikipedia knows, I doubt it.

Yes, but I suspect that consumers buy .308 tactical rifles because "that's what the Marine snipers use..." I doubt that it's because the .308 is someohw ballistically superior to all other potential "sniper" rounds. So, it comesback to military logistics.

Maybe one of our military trained guys can chime in here... kdvollmer??? Do military "snipers" have a choice now as to what rifle/scope/cartridge combo they use? Have they always had a choice?