Less expensive shotgun scope
#1
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: freeport il USA
I am looking for a new scope for my rem. 870 with a cantilever barrel. I would like to keep the cost below 125.00 so I am considering the Bushnell Banner or Trophy, and theNikon Prostaff. Tell me any good and bad about these three scopes and also offer up any other options that you guys like in this price range. Thanks for all info. and suggestions in advance.
#2
Fork Horn
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From:
For 50.00 more you could get a leupold shotgun scope.A lot of stores have them on sale when deer season rolls around.Do it right the first time adn youll never have to worry about it again.I have a 1-4 leupold on my H&R ultra slugger and its never let me down.Clear as a bell and i have had to move it since i sighted it in.
#3
I do like the Leupold shotgun 2-7 scope and have it on a couple slug guns. In the past I used the Bushnell Trophy 1.75-4 with circle reticle. Trophy is a really nice scope for the money and mine served me well for quite a few years. I paid right around a hundred for the Trophy and around two hundred for the VX-I 2-7..
Trophy has a really wide field of view and good eye relief...
Trophy has a really wide field of view and good eye relief...
#4
You asked my opinion - here it is.
If I had to choose from the Bushnell or Nikon you mentioned, I'd take the Nikon hands down. Much better optics IMO, much.
You should consider the Simmons Pro-Diamond scope. We have 2 H&R Ultra Slug Hunters and they both have the Simmons scopes. I bought the 12 gauge one first and liked the scope so much that when we bought the 20 gauge there wasn't a question as to what scope to fit it with. Fantastic light gathering.
The 12 has been shot ALOT and has never been re-zero'd. The 20 has never been re-zero'd either. Never a problem with either. The Simmons have full 32mm lenses (back and front). I wouldn't consider any shotgun scope with the 32mm rear lense and 20mm front. There is no way a 32/20 scope can gather decent light like a full 32/32.
I do not like and cannot understand any use for a variable power shotgun scope. I recommend a straight 4X (Simmons #7790D) for shooting out to 150 yards. If you don't think you'll shoot more than say 75 yards I'd go with a 2X (Simmons #7789D). Neither one should be more than a hundred bucks with the 2X probobly $10-15 cheaper than the 4X.
Take a look at them.
And DON'T ever think of putting a rifle scope on any shotgun. Rifle scopes can't take the unique recoil a shotgun delivers.
If I had to choose from the Bushnell or Nikon you mentioned, I'd take the Nikon hands down. Much better optics IMO, much.
You should consider the Simmons Pro-Diamond scope. We have 2 H&R Ultra Slug Hunters and they both have the Simmons scopes. I bought the 12 gauge one first and liked the scope so much that when we bought the 20 gauge there wasn't a question as to what scope to fit it with. Fantastic light gathering.
The 12 has been shot ALOT and has never been re-zero'd. The 20 has never been re-zero'd either. Never a problem with either. The Simmons have full 32mm lenses (back and front). I wouldn't consider any shotgun scope with the 32mm rear lense and 20mm front. There is no way a 32/20 scope can gather decent light like a full 32/32.
I do not like and cannot understand any use for a variable power shotgun scope. I recommend a straight 4X (Simmons #7790D) for shooting out to 150 yards. If you don't think you'll shoot more than say 75 yards I'd go with a 2X (Simmons #7789D). Neither one should be more than a hundred bucks with the 2X probobly $10-15 cheaper than the 4X.
Take a look at them.
And DON'T ever think of putting a rifle scope on any shotgun. Rifle scopes can't take the unique recoil a shotgun delivers.
#8
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,828
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
ORIGINAL: Red Lion
sjsfire, I have the same scope on my savage ML.
sjsfire, I have the same scope on my savage ML.
#10
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: freeport il USA
For those of you that prefer the Nikon does the lower field of view ever cause any problems? I thought I would like to have a higher FOV for any deer that might come through at a faster pace but not sure. Any problems with 2x being the lowest setting?


