RE: Ruger No. 1
 

I had a Ruger No l in 416 Rem mag. I really likeed it and it shot well with no work required.

RE: Ruger No. 1
 

I had a Ruger No 1 in 22-250. I also like how it handled but found it a little heavy. I did how ever have a problem with mounting a scope and had to get extended scope rings. The setup just wasn’t the way I liked it and sold it...

RE: Ruger No. 1
 

I've owned two of them. A 25-06 and a 300 Win. Mag. Both gave substantial recoil, in my mind anyhow, and accuracy was not up to my expectations. They ended up being traded.

RE: Ruger No. 1
 

375 H&H isn't a caliber....

DM

RE: Ruger No. 1
 

I find that quite strange, because, it looks like a casing, with a .375 cal bullet on top, how isn't .375 H&H Magnum, a caliber?

RE: Ruger No. 1
 

375 H & H is a cartridge. The caliber is .378, they are messing with you. Tom.

RE: Ruger No. 1
 

I thought the .375 H&H, used a .375 Dia. bullet?

RE: Ruger No. 1
 

So does the 378 Weatherby Mag. and the 375 Rem. Ultra Mag. They all shoot the same size bullet 0.375" ø however the 375 H&H Mag. is a cartridge...

RE: Ruger No. 1
 

Ok, next time I'm at the gun store, and I wanna look at a gun and the clerk says, which one? I'm gonna say, "I want the one in .270 cartridge.":D

RE: Ruger No. 1
 

You forgot Win. so it's a 270 Winchester or it could be 270 WSM and then it could be the 270 Weatherby Mag...