Disappointed in my ammo
#11
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
From: NW Arkansas
Not same thing, an arrowhead has many edges which slice and cut the organs like knives. Why does it matter if the bullet passes through or not? I would rather bust all the deer's vitals and get stuck in the shoulder, than to pass all the way through and miss the vitals, and allowing the deer to get away.
#12
ORIGINAL: Chantecler111
Not same thing, an arrowhead has many edges which slice and cut the organs like knives. Why does it matter if the bullet passes through or not? I would rather bust all the deer's vitals and get stuck in the shoulder, than to pass all the way through and miss the vitals, and allowing the deer to get away.
Not same thing, an arrowhead has many edges which slice and cut the organs like knives. Why does it matter if the bullet passes through or not? I would rather bust all the deer's vitals and get stuck in the shoulder, than to pass all the way through and miss the vitals, and allowing the deer to get away.
#13
Fork Horn
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: Federal Way, WA
ORIGINAL: Chantecler111
Not same thing, an arrowhead has many edges which slice and cut the organs like knives. Why does it matter if the bullet passes through or not? I would rather bust all the deer's vitals and get stuck in the shoulder, than to pass all the way through and miss the vitals, and allowing the deer to get away.
Not same thing, an arrowhead has many edges which slice and cut the organs like knives. Why does it matter if the bullet passes through or not? I would rather bust all the deer's vitals and get stuck in the shoulder, than to pass all the way through and miss the vitals, and allowing the deer to get away.
A bullet has slicing edges, petals, that cut through organs. A pass through gives you a good blood trail.
#14
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
From: NW Arkansas
ORIGINAL: haugenna
Who says you can't get a pass through and take out vitals????? A bullet stuck in the shoulder may not disable that shoulder. I like to go all the way through BUSTING the opposite shoulder or both shoulders, disabling the animal from running up and down hills I may have to drag him over. If you miss the vitals and have a pass through...thats just a bad shot period.
A bullet has slicing edges, petals, that cut through organs. A pass through gives you a good blood trail.
ORIGINAL: Chantecler111
Not same thing, an arrowhead has many edges which slice and cut the organs like knives. Why does it matter if the bullet passes through or not? I would rather bust all the deer's vitals and get stuck in the shoulder, than to pass all the way through and miss the vitals, and allowing the deer to get away.
Not same thing, an arrowhead has many edges which slice and cut the organs like knives. Why does it matter if the bullet passes through or not? I would rather bust all the deer's vitals and get stuck in the shoulder, than to pass all the way through and miss the vitals, and allowing the deer to get away.
A bullet has slicing edges, petals, that cut through organs. A pass through gives you a good blood trail.
#15
Fork Horn
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: Federal Way, WA
[/quote]
I do not wish to pursue this any longer, we could argue all night and get nowhere, you hunt how you want to hunt, and I'll hunt how I want to hunt.
[/quote]
Ok...fine by me.
I do not wish to pursue this any longer, we could argue all night and get nowhere, you hunt how you want to hunt, and I'll hunt how I want to hunt.
[/quote]
Ok...fine by me.

#16
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
From: NW Arkansas
ORIGINAL: haugenna
[/quote]
Ok...fine by me.

[/quote]
Judging by your 30-378 post, you like to kill em' from 2 miles away.

#18
I thought you weren't gonna persue it any longer?
Anyway, I don't agree much with Ch.111, but in this case he's right. Most of the time, not always, but most of the time when a bullet passes completely through an animal, it has not caused the same amount of tissue damage as a bullet that has tumbled inside (thus preventing pass through), or one that has struck bone (thus causing tumble and bone fragmentation). Most commonly, a bullet will pass through due to being light combined with high velocity, and not striking a hard surface (bone).
Anyway, I don't agree much with Ch.111, but in this case he's right. Most of the time, not always, but most of the time when a bullet passes completely through an animal, it has not caused the same amount of tissue damage as a bullet that has tumbled inside (thus preventing pass through), or one that has struck bone (thus causing tumble and bone fragmentation). Most commonly, a bullet will pass through due to being light combined with high velocity, and not striking a hard surface (bone).
#19
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
From: NW Arkansas
ORIGINAL: elgallo114
I thought you weren't gonna persue it any longer?
Anyway, I don't agree much with Ch.111, but in this case he's right. Most of the time, not always, but most of the time when a bullet passes completely through an animal, it has not caused the same amount of tissue damage as a bullet that has tumbled inside (thus preventing pass through), or one that has struck bone (thus causing tumble and bone fragmentation). Most commonly, a bullet will pass through due to being light combined with high velocity, and not striking a hard surface (bone).
I thought you weren't gonna persue it any longer?
Anyway, I don't agree much with Ch.111, but in this case he's right. Most of the time, not always, but most of the time when a bullet passes completely through an animal, it has not caused the same amount of tissue damage as a bullet that has tumbled inside (thus preventing pass through), or one that has struck bone (thus causing tumble and bone fragmentation). Most commonly, a bullet will pass through due to being light combined with high velocity, and not striking a hard surface (bone).

#20
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,192
Likes: 0
From: Rivesville, WV
111- I am with you. An arrow kills by hemmoraging(did I spell that right). An arrow slices through the animal, and the goal is massive blood loss. There is no hydrostatic(I spelled that right) shock with an arrow. Therefore a pass through is essential.
A bullet kills by hydrostatic shock. A pass through's advantage is the better blood trail that two holes create. You can shoot a deer with an arrow and one with a bullet in the exact same spot. The bullet may drop him in his tracks. Rarely does an arrow drop a deer in it's tracks. The deer has to bleed with the arrow.
A bullet kills by hydrostatic shock. A pass through's advantage is the better blood trail that two holes create. You can shoot a deer with an arrow and one with a bullet in the exact same spot. The bullet may drop him in his tracks. Rarely does an arrow drop a deer in it's tracks. The deer has to bleed with the arrow.


