Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

Bears...

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-08-2006, 05:50 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18
Default Bears...

I'm from mississippi but curious anyway as to why most gun magazines say a .300 Win mag won't kill a large bear??
Joshsrugershooter is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 05:58 PM
  #2  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 1,673
Default RE: Bears...

I have never found the answer to this either, I guess so the .338 Win Mag can get more publicity. The .300 Win Mag will take anything in NA, no ifs ands or buts about it.
Chantecler111 is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 06:22 PM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 493
Default RE: Bears...

The 338 win mag is a fine and powerful cartridge, and will add a little insurance over any 300 mag. The 300's will likely do a good enough job of any game in north america, provided tough and heavy bullets are used. I would feel at ease with just my 45-70 and some heavy cast LBT type bullets at 1800-2000 fps. They will out penetrate any 338 or 300 , and break more bone while doing so.
fornra@yahoo.com is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 06:41 PM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 1,673
Default RE: Bears...

I'll do you one better, my 500 S&W with a 400 Gr. SJSP at 1800 fps will outpenetrate the ole' .338. btw my 500 is a rifle.
Chantecler111 is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 06:46 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 5
Default RE: Bears...

the magazines are just covering theirselves incase someone is a lowsy shot. they know as well as we do that the 300 could easily down the bear they are just scared of the lawsuit
paslodenailin710 is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 06:58 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18
Default RE: Bears...

I think a .300 Win Mag Loaded with 180 grain plus Swift AFRAMES or TBBC's Or Failsafes would be fine on any Grizzly
Joshsrugershooter is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 07:00 PM
  #7  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 1,673
Default RE: Bears...

ORIGINAL: paslodenailin710

the magazines are just covering theirselves incase someone is a lowsy shot. they know as well as we do that the 300 could easily down the bear they are just scared of the lawsuit
Yeah. out of all the calibers, it seems the .300 Mags, are used by the worst shots, they just cannot handle the gun, and still take it hunting.
Chantecler111 is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 08:46 PM
  #8  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,290
Default RE: Bears...

Josh, just curious. Do you recall which gun rag ran the article?


biscuit jake is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 09:00 PM
  #9  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 1,673
Default RE: Bears...

ORIGINAL: biscuit jake

Josh, just curious. Do you recall which gun rag ran the article?
I have seen Guns & Ammo say it several times, especially when they were talking about the .338 class of cartridges, they claimed the 300 mags to be inadequate.
Chantecler111 is offline  
Old 11-08-2006, 10:26 PM
  #10  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Posts: 1,290
Default RE: Bears...

I have not had a G&A subscription for decades. Interesting. They used to take the position about "get a bigger gun" alot. So perhaps no surprise. I would want (personally) a larger bore for the big bears but in fact hunters on the board have even used the 7mm Rem Mag. You would need a good bullet with high sectional density, and there are lots of good bullets in the 7mm and 30 calibers. I just tote a 45 70 when I am around bears. To heck with the small bores.
biscuit jake is offline  


Quick Reply: Bears...


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.