Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

Is this true?

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-07-2006 | 05:49 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,673
Likes: 0
From: Northeast Tennessee
Default Is this true?

well i heard a guy say today that he didnt like the .270 caliber because it didnt have the same knockdown power as a .308 or a 30-06? IS this true because ive seen 270's drop them in their tracks. Just wondering considering im buying a 270. As a side note i killed me a doe this weekend with the ol smokepole [8D]!! first with a muzzleloader!!!

Matt/TN is offline  
Reply
Old 11-07-2006 | 05:52 PM
  #2  
longrifle1000's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,688
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Default RE: Is this true?

I doubt a deer could ever tell the difference.
longrifle1000 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-07-2006 | 06:18 PM
  #3  
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Is this true?

1. Longrifle is certainly correct.

2. The term "knockdown power" is hottly debated. Bullets do not literally "knockdown" game animals. They do/can instantly incapacite them.

If you've got a gun that's in 270 or are looking at one you shouldn't feel the need for a bigger bullet on deer. (The 270 is just a 30-06 that shoots a slightly smaller diameter bullet.)
Soilarch is offline  
Reply
Old 11-07-2006 | 06:32 PM
  #4  
Rebel Hog's Avatar
Dominant Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 26,323
Likes: 0
From: WC FL
Default RE: Is this true?

I shot a .270/130gr NP for years! I have shot deer at 200 to 300yds atPower Lines and they just dropped. Don't let anyone one tell you that a .270 is not sufficient!
Rebel Hog is offline  
Reply
Old 11-07-2006 | 06:36 PM
  #5  
TUK101's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
From: Spokane Washington
Default RE: Is this true?

ORIGINAL: Soilarch

1. Longrifle is certainly correct.

2. The term "knockdown power" is hottly debated. Bullets do not literally "knockdown" game animals. They do/can instantly incapacite them.

If you've got a gun that's in 270 or are looking at one you shouldn't feel the need for a bigger bullet on deer. (The 270 is just a 30-06 that shoots a slightly smaller diameter bullet.)
I agree with everything that Soilarch said. Before the big magnums and all of the gains that have been made with bullets and ballistics in the past 20 years the .270 was known for its flat shooting and bullet speed. The military still uses the .270 as its sniper round that is meant to kill. (The way that I understand it is the .223 is the snipers wound it round the .270 is the one where they mean bussiness). My great uncle used to win his fair share of competitions with his Winchester .270 back when everyone was hooked on the 30-06. The .06 has a bit more knockdown power and a bit wider range of bullet selection but the 270 kicks a bit less and still has the power to take down large game. Besides, its all about bullet placement in my book. It doesnt matter what gun you shoot if you cant put the bullet where its going to hit something vital.
TUK101 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-07-2006 | 06:38 PM
  #6  
TUK101's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
From: Spokane Washington
Default RE: Is this true?

Also, My family and I ( gread grandad, grandad, dad) have shot the .270 for years and it has always brought in the meat for us. My .270 has claimed 2 deer so far this year. (One by my daughter and one by my son).
TUK101 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-07-2006 | 06:44 PM
  #7  
longrifle1000's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,688
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Default RE: Is this true?

ORIGINAL: TUK101

ORIGINAL: Soilarch

1. Longrifle is certainly correct.

2. The term "knockdown power" is hottly debated. Bullets do not literally "knockdown" game animals. They do/can instantly incapacite them.

If you've got a gun that's in 270 or are looking at one you shouldn't feel the need for a bigger bullet on deer. (The 270 is just a 30-06 that shoots a slightly smaller diameter bullet.)
I agree with everything that Soilarch said. Before the big magnums and all of the gains that have been made with bullets and ballistics in the past 20 years the .270 was known for its flat shooting and bullet speed. The military still uses the .270 as its sniper round that is meant to kill. (The way that I understand it is the .223 is the snipers wound it round the .270 is the one where they mean bussiness). My great uncle used to win his fair share of competitions with his Winchester .270 back when everyone was hooked on the 30-06. The .06 has a bit more knockdown power and a bit wider range of bullet selection but the 270 kicks a bit less and still has the power to take down large game. Besides, its all about bullet placement in my book. It doesnt matter what gun you shoot if you cant put the bullet where its going to hit something vital.
The military has never used the 270, for anything. They have, and still use the 308 win in bolt action sniper rifles and the M14. Some sniper rifles were chambered in 30-06, and they were used up into the Vietnam era. FYI
longrifle1000 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-07-2006 | 11:21 PM
  #8  
BYRD250's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Is this true?

[/quote]
I agree with everything that Soilarch said. Before the big magnums and all of the gains that have been made with bullets and ballistics in the past 20 years the .270 was known for its flat shooting and bullet speed. The military still uses the .270 as its sniper round that is meant to kill. (The way that I understand it is the .223 is the snipers wound it round the .270 is the one where they mean bussiness). My great uncle used to win his fair share of competitions with his Winchester .270 back when everyone was hooked on the 30-06. The .06 has a bit more knockdown power and a bit wider range of bullet selection but the 270 kicks a bit less and still has the power to take down large game. Besides, its all about bullet placement in my book. It doesnt matter what gun you shoot if you cant put the bullet where its going to hit something vital.
[/quote]

They use the 308 round. Ive heard some talk of them using a 300 win mag as well. Never heard of them using a 270.
BYRD250 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-08-2006 | 01:09 AM
  #9  
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Default RE: Is this true?

i agree with bullet placement if you hit them in the right place it doesnt matter i have seen whitetails dropped in there tracks at 75yards with a 22lr in the head maybe notdead but down for the count i mean the 243 is one of the most used deer guns there is so a 270 is plenty probably until you step up to moose and big bears then i would opt for a 30 cal of some sort
jsb57 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-08-2006 | 07:11 AM
  #10  
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Default RE: Is this true?

OMG another internet genius!

The military has never chambered a sniper rifle in 270. YOu got to be kidding me. Why do people feel the need to postcrap like this. The military sniper rifles shoot 7.62 NATO, otherwise known as the 308 win. The 1000 Yard rifle team shoots the M40 which is essentially a Remington Model 40X chambered in 300 win mag. Many of the sniper teams (ie seal teams) are going to the 50 bmg for the "strike the fear of god" effect. The only military cartridge shooting a 270 cal bullet, to my knowledge, is the new 6.8 SPC (thats 6.8mm Special Purpose Cartridge) which isgenerating mediocre reviews. It was designed to work on the M16 frame and bolt which is based on the 5.56 Nato otherwise known as the 223. So it is in essence a 223 necked up to 270.
ShatoDavis is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.