Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

338 Federal

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-08-2006 | 11:58 AM
  #11  
James B's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 11,474
Likes: 0
From: Wall SD USA & Jamestown ND
Default RE: 338 Federal

For those who liked the 358 Winchester, this should be even a little better. This because of the same edge the 338-06 has over the 35 Whelen. More SD bullets and a bit flatter shooting. As mentioned above, it should be an excellent woods hunting round for big critters at modest ranges. I will have one. However, it won't be until the smoke clears from the last purchase.

EKM. Is the CZ going to be available in that new sizzeler?
James B is offline  
Reply
Old 04-09-2006 | 08:57 PM
  #12  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,964
Likes: 0
From: Rocky Mountains, Colorado
Default RE: 338 Federal

EKM. Is the CZ going to be available in that new sizzeler?
Methinks more like Marlin!

My impression of the 338 Federal?
Kinda weak.
ELKampMaster is offline  
Reply
Old 04-09-2006 | 09:01 PM
  #13  
James B's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 11,474
Likes: 0
From: Wall SD USA & Jamestown ND
Default RE: 338 Federal

I am Shocked

Fedaral will offer a 180 grain Accubond at 2830 fps.
185 Barnes TXS at 2750 fps.
210 grain Nosler Partition at 2630.

It should have good energy out to 250 yards.
James B is offline  
Reply
Old 04-10-2006 | 12:23 AM
  #14  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,925
Likes: 0
From: Baileysville, WV
Default RE: 338 Federal

If they woulda put the word magnum behind it he woulda already ordered 5
Doe Dumper is offline  
Reply
Old 04-10-2006 | 06:33 AM
  #15  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,964
Likes: 0
From: Rocky Mountains, Colorado
Default RE: 338 Federal

Au contrare, Doe Dump

The word magnum doesn't make a cartridge good, performance does.

Actually, mylast two rifles purchasedhave NOTbeen magnums!
416 Rigby
458 Lott

No "magnum" word after those,,,.
....kinda been looking at a 7mm STW--- no "magnum" word there either, however, they all have performace!

Speaking of performance, IMHO, 338 Federal is a step backwards not forwards, except perhaps for accommodating the ever-growing "recoil sensitive" crowd.

I'm thoroughly underwhelmed.
ELKampMaster is offline  
Reply
Old 04-10-2006 | 09:05 AM
  #16  
DM
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,813
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 338 Federal

Fedaral will offer a 180 grain Accubond at 2830 fps.
185 Barnes TXS at 2750 fps.
It shouldn't take too long before someone will will shoot something BIG with one of those loads, not get the penetration they should, and proclaim it a junk caliber...

Drilling Man
DM is offline  
Reply
Old 04-10-2006 | 01:05 PM
  #17  
James B's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 11,474
Likes: 0
From: Wall SD USA & Jamestown ND
Default RE: 338 Federal

It will short you about 100 yards compared to the 338 Win mag. The 338 Federal has the same ME at 300 as the 338 Win Mag has at 400. I doon't see it as a step up or a step down, It simply a different step. The above ballistics are for the 180 grain accubond. in both guns.
James B is offline  
Reply
Old 04-10-2006 | 01:25 PM
  #18  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,964
Likes: 0
From: Rocky Mountains, Colorado
Default RE: 338 Federal

180 grain?
For big game that is a good .308 bullet.

In a 338, it doesn't strike me as being a real penetrator.
Poor sectional density IMHO.
ELKampMaster is offline  
Reply
Old 04-10-2006 | 02:16 PM
  #19  
James B's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 11,474
Likes: 0
From: Wall SD USA & Jamestown ND
Default RE: 338 Federal

That site did not list the heavier bullets but just running the figures, the same hold true for the 185 and 210. It costs you about 100 yards. I am betting that the 185 grain TXS at 2700 will have no shortage of penetration. Time will tell. I will be willing to give it a try in the field. More bullets will come out for it as well. I think bullet makers will add a new bullet or two for it if time testing bears out the first tests on Elk and moose.
James B is offline  
Reply
Old 04-10-2006 | 02:24 PM
  #20  
DM
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,813
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: 338 Federal

That site did not list the heavier bullets but just running the figures, the same hold true for the 185 and 210. It costs you about 100 yards.
Your too busy looking at the energy... I'm with EKM, i want some penetration and that's what i was refering to in my last post!!!

Drilling Man
DM is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.