Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Guns
 30-06 vs 7mag >

30-06 vs 7mag

Community
Guns Like firearms themselves, there's a wide variety of opinions on what's the best gun.

30-06 vs 7mag

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-11-2005, 06:24 PM
  #11  
 
Icedragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 735
Default RE: 30-06 vs 7mag

The 06 has plenty of knockdown power and can go long distances.
Icedragon is offline  
Old 06-11-2005, 07:14 PM
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 505
Default RE: 30-06 vs 7mag

they are close but the '06 is king for a reason. I hate paper tables cause they don't mean squat, however, lets look at the 175/165 gr comparisons by Mr Hornady.....OBTW, I own a 7 mag Tikka and a number of Sako '06's......

7mag..175 gr sp.....2800'/sec ( a wee bit of a stretch) 0 at 200, -7.7 at 300, -22.7 at 400.
energy.....2656/100, 2308/200, /1999/300, 1726/400....darn good.

'06.. 165gr btsp.....2900'/sec...(a wee wee stretch) 0 at 200, -7.3 at 300, -21.4 at 400.
energy.....2655 at 100, 2276 at 200, 1944 at 300, 1655 at 400.

Well, there goes the flatter theory....Gosh, they sure seem to be about even don't they? I like 'um both for elk and deer....both great cartridges. But remember...age before beauty and the 7 mag loves lots of powder!!! Regards, Rick.
48thguns is offline  
Old 06-11-2005, 07:39 PM
  #13  
Fork Horn
 
FastShootingCarts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 383
Default RE: 30-06 vs 7mag

ORIGINAL: handloader1

Their preformance is so close it's almost not worth the argument. [&:][&:] Good luck.

You're right. Not worth an argument but rather a discussion of the two carts. I shot both and would prefer a 7mm mag over a .30-06 in the field anyday. Just my opinion of course.
FastShootingCarts is offline  
Old 06-11-2005, 07:48 PM
  #14  
Fork Horn
 
FastShootingCarts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 383
Default RE: 30-06 vs 7mag

ORIGINAL: 48thguns

they are close but the '06 is king for a reason. I hate paper tables cause they don't mean squat, however, lets look at the 175/165 gr comparisons by Mr Hornady.....OBTW, I own a 7 mag Tikka and a number of Sako '06's......

7mag..175 gr sp.....2800'/sec ( a wee bit of a stretch) 0 at 200, -7.7 at 300, -22.7 at 400.
energy.....2656/100, 2308/200, /1999/300, 1726/400....darn good.

'06.. 165gr btsp.....2900'/sec...(a wee wee stretch) 0 at 200, -7.3 at 300, -21.4 at 400.
energy.....2655 at 100, 2276 at 200, 1944 at 300, 1655 at 400.

Well, there goes the flatter theory....Gosh, they sure seem to be about even don't they? I like 'um both for elk and deer....both great cartridges. But remember...age before beauty and the 7 mag loves lots of powder!!! Regards, Rick.
Those stats sure do look close. What rifle was used and what powders for the loads. Do you have that info? Was the boat tail load as accurate as the 7mm soft point?
FastShootingCarts is offline  
Old 06-11-2005, 08:25 PM
  #15  
Boone & Crockett
 
bigbulls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,679
Default RE: 30-06 vs 7mag

Those numbers look to be close but they are misleading. Being that a 7mm bore is smaller than a 30 bore you have to compare bullets of different weights but similar lengths and BC numbers.

The larger the bore the faster the same weight bullet can be driven with the same case.

If you want to do a fair comparison when useing a 175 grain bullet out of a 7mm bore then you would need to choose a 200 grain bullet for the 30-06. A much fairer comparison between the two would be a 180 grain 30 caliber bullet and a 160 grain 7mm bullet. They have similar lengths, similar BC numbers, and similar SD numbers.
bigbulls is offline  
Old 06-11-2005, 08:28 PM
  #16  
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Central Michigan
Posts: 982
Default RE: 30-06 vs 7mag

Both would work fine but if I was hunting 1000+ pound moose I would rather have the 30-06.
Gundigest is offline  
Old 06-11-2005, 08:31 PM
  #17  
Boone & Crockett
 
James B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wall SD USA & Jamestown ND
Posts: 11,474
Default RE: 30-06 vs 7mag

Just exactly what I was thinking.. But close they are. I would go with the 06 because I have complete confidence in it.
James B is offline  
Old 06-11-2005, 09:29 PM
  #18  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bradford, Ontario
Posts: 2,205
Default RE: 30-06 vs 7mag

I have owned both and killed moose with both. Flip a coin. I use the 7mmrem mag because its a little flatter shooting and with good loads develops a bit more energy than an 06. The moose don't seem to know the difference.
TerryM is offline  
Old 06-11-2005, 10:38 PM
  #19  
Fork Horn
 
FastShootingCarts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 383
Default RE: 30-06 vs 7mag

ORIGINAL: Gundigest

Both would work fine but if I was hunting 1000+ pound moose I would rather have the 30-06.

1000+ pound moose? I think I would step it up a bit there.
FastShootingCarts is offline  
Old 06-12-2005, 08:13 AM
  #20  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bradford, Ontario
Posts: 2,205
Default RE: 30-06 vs 7mag

1000+ pound moose? I think I would step it up a bit there.
Moose are not hard to kill. Almost like shooting a hole in a truck tire, just wait for the air to come out.
TerryM is offline  


Quick Reply: 30-06 vs 7mag


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.