![]() |
remington 673
Im looking for a new rifle to use in upstate New York for deer. From what I've read about the 673 guide series in .300 ultra mag it looks real good to me. Does anyone have anything to say about it?
|
RE: remington 673
Get the .350. It's a cool round that looks uglier than hell! Plus it's not a belly button round. AKA: Not everyone has one!
|
RE: remington 673
The 673 Guide gun looks cool to me.:) I like the 300saum but I like the 350 even better. If I were hunting in a area were my shots were 200-yards & under? I would buy the 350.:)
|
RE: remington 673
got the 673 in 350 rem... it handles well, shoots an inch or better with factory ammo, and did a splendid job of putting down a nice buck last fall, one shot and it didnt move, shot was around a hundred yards. It is a nice looking rifle that feels well in the hand, balance just right, and shoots well, and the 350 round is available around here in almost all sporting goods stores ( except wally world) and it only gets better with reloads.
|
RE: remington 673
Anyone seen or used one of the Ruger 77IIs or the RBZ in the .350 that they are offering this year?
|
RE: remington 673
Ruger rifle with the 350 Rem. Mag also comes with a 24” barrel compared to the 22” barrel for Remingtons 673.
|
RE: remington 673
Man what else would someone want for woods hunting?..also has a built in can opener.
|
RE: remington 673
I have the 350 rem, 6.5 rem, and a 243 that's one of 500. So far I've shot the 350 and I must say it's the best shooting rifle that I have. Three shot groups consistently well under 1" and it will be my go to rifle for deer this year.
Polack |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:34 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.