Community
Firearm Review Forum Rifles, shotguns, blackpowder, pistols, etc... read the latest reviews of hot new firearms here.

7mm WSM VS 7mm rem mag

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-22-2009 | 06:45 PM
  #11  
Big Z's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 0
Default

Love my 7mmRM, though I do like the thought of a 7 short some day.
Big Z is offline  
Reply
Old 12-22-2009 | 06:53 PM
  #12  
Sheridan's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
From:
Default

We all know what a 7MM Rem Mag can do !!!



So..........what is the difference between a "ultra" mag and a "short" mag !?!?
Sheridan is offline  
Reply
Old 12-23-2009 | 04:38 PM
  #13  
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: central NY
Default

+8 or 9 both are GREAT calibers though.
snuffynra is offline  
Reply
Old 12-26-2009 | 09:29 AM
  #14  
Spike
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default

+9 or 10 for the 7mag, even though i have the short magnum. ammo for it is too hard to find
titansben15 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-26-2009 | 03:33 PM
  #15  
DKA's Avatar
DKA
Spike
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Lumberton, NC
Default

Agree with those on the 7mm Rem Mag. Had both and seen no advantage to the 7mm WSM, so sold it and have not looked back.
DKA is offline  
Reply
Old 09-10-2010 | 09:17 AM
  #16  
Backwoods7's Avatar
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: West TN
Default

+11 for 7mmrem mag. Only shot 1 deer with it but it droped like it was hit with a ton of bricks
Backwoods7 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-10-2010 | 06:18 PM
  #17  
bigbulls's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,679
Likes: 0
Default

Imagine that, if you fire the same bullet at the same velocity you get the same in flight ballistics and same terminal performance. Who'd a thunk it?????

I like the ________ because it drops deer in their tracks. Yeah, and the other wouldn't.

Last edited by bigbulls; 09-10-2010 at 06:21 PM.
bigbulls is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-2010 | 06:00 AM
  #18  
Spike
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Martin, OH
Default

I own neither, but if I were buying one I'd also go with the 7 RM. But only because I'm concerned with the lack of ammo availability for the WSM. I actually like the concept of the WSM better, but don't want to be stuck without ammo choices in the future, as I don't reload.
Seaark18 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-2010 | 06:37 AM
  #19  
needs_recoil's Avatar
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Default

the wsm's were brought out almost ten years ago. I know its not 60 years. But they are still selling left and right and anywhere I find 300 win bullets I find 300 wsm. I dont think the short mags are going anywhere. 75 years ago the 220 swift wasnt gonna stay around long either. Nobody can predict what cartridges will and will not weather the test of time. The short action light weight rifle combo will continue on. I have the 270 and 300 wsm and love them. I agree you cant tell the difference between the short mags and the standard magnum cartridges. If you cant tell the difference why put one down and praise the other. Between the two (7mm rem or 7mm wsm) I would take the short mag everytime. But thats only if I had to keep it the way I bought it. Ill never own another 7mm remington because like the 3 I already have, they will all turn into stw's. In my eye thats where they really start to shine.
needs_recoil is offline  
Reply
Old 09-14-2010 | 07:52 AM
  #20  
Western MA Hunter's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,168
Likes: 0
From: Western Massachusetts
Default

another vote for 7mm Rem Mag...
Western MA Hunter is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.