Who makes better bases and rings, warne or ?????

..."the captain and the kid, stepping in the ring"....................E.J.

In that price range...... IMHO no one.

Warne makes decent mounts and rings. Look at Talleyas well, for only a few $ more.

Yep, I have Warnes and they are great, but I have also heard good things about the Talleys. You can't go wrong with either of them.

bigbulls/1shot 1kill/jeepkid,
As bigbulls stated not for the SAME $$$$
However, I heard "others" talk about Talley and Millet being the top of the line.
Are "they" that much better than Warne or do you get alot for a few more dollars.

...."couldn't fool us".............................E.J.

I don't know if I would throw Millet in the same league as Talley or even Warne. Millet rings are decent and the one thing I dolike about them, is both front and rear rings can be adjusted for windage of need be. No, Warne and Talley do not cost the same. You will spend a litlte more for Talley.

Lets just say, you and I could never tell the difference.

1shot 1kill,
Are the Talley's worth it in your opinion(additional money aside)?
I want to buy a Burris signature select scope, would you consider the signature select bases and rings?
I have heard good and bad comments aboutthe "new" signature selectrings.

..."are there chances in life for little dirt cowboys"............................E.J.

I would probably go with the Burris Zee rings if you want to stay all Burris. They have a teflon insert in them to align the scope. Scope top benchrest shooters are even using them with $1500+ scopes.

jeepkid,
I understand that the "coating" insures that the rings will never leave a mark on your scope.
The negative comments I heard was "difficulty" in mounting the scope to the rings/rings to the scope.
I might be able to live with that; my question is do they compare in terms of quality, to let's say Warne?

...."hand and hand went music and the rhyme"...........................E.J.