Remington 700 BDL
#2
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,984
Likes: 0
From: MB.
I had one for years chambered in a 7 mm R.M. and never had any problems with it. Now I have one in a 222 and haven’t had any issues with it either. I just find the BDL to be to much of nice rifle for a hunting rifle and would rather have a synthetic stock instead....
#4
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,600
Likes: 0
From: S.W. Pa.-- Heart in North Central Pa. mountains-
While synthetic is nice and has little tendency to cause bedding shift problems due to stock warpage, swelling, etc., I have always been a big fan of the 700 BDL. Probably always will be. A pretty piece of wood with deep-blued steel,drop floorpate.......just doesn't get much better for me.
#5
ORIGINAL: dippinfirefighter05
whats your thoughts on this gun is it a good gun? i just bought one to replace my model 94 that is 5 generations old, so whats your thoughts
whats your thoughts on this gun is it a good gun? i just bought one to replace my model 94 that is 5 generations old, so whats your thoughts
Sold it in 1978 for $200.[:@]RKW finish is what is used on Bowling Pins...
#8
I used to have the 700 BDL w/synthetic stock in .308. Great shooter I would reccommend it to anybody. Only thing I might suggest is having the trigger lightened up a few pounds. Shouldn't cost more than $30 or so at a gunsmith.
#9
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
From:
ORIGINAL: kdvollmer
I used to have the 700 BDL w/synthetic stock in .308. Great shooter I would reccommend it to anybody. Only thing I might suggest is having the trigger lightened up a few pounds. Shouldn't cost more than $30 or so at a gunsmith.
I used to have the 700 BDL w/synthetic stock in .308. Great shooter I would reccommend it to anybody. Only thing I might suggest is having the trigger lightened up a few pounds. Shouldn't cost more than $30 or so at a gunsmith.


