HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Firearm Review Forum (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/firearm-review-forum-33/)
-   -   270 or 30-06? (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/firearm-review-forum/20760-270-30-06-a.html)

1eyedfish 02-15-2003 03:25 PM

RE: 270 or 30-06?
 
Have both of those & like yall say either would work & the .270 works fine for elk etc also.(i wouldnt be popin them at 500 yrs whatever i use, including them calibers & hoping theres enough energy left)

Not exotic calibers & been around awhile , ammo is easy to find & cheaper.


I do like fat some to 45/70 etc( id use that in africa etc i think) poor mans big bore.

PABuck_HNTR 02-15-2003 07:10 PM

RE: 270 or 30-06?
 
Like everyone else before me said. Either one will suffice

1eyedfish 02-15-2003 08:16 PM

RE: 270 or 30-06?
 
surfice is to say .. it works? as oranges are to oranges.;) they are close.


They shot fish in Vt i heard?

an use bait to catch



eldeguello 02-16-2003 09:42 AM

RE: 270 or 30-06?
 
I have both, but used a .270 extensively for three years in Alaska with 150-grain Nosler Partition bullets. Although I made a point of carrying a .375 H&H when actively hunting Brown/Grizzly Bears, for some reason, I always seemed to be carrying the .270 when I came across the larger animals. The .270 worked every time for me, with the max number of shots ever needed = 2!! The largest animal I ever saw killed with a .270 was a relatively large Polar Bear (this in the days before the Endangered Species Act) that was taken by a doctor' s wife from Fairbanks!! But then, Eleanor O' Connor killed her elephant with a .30/' 06!! " Any gun good, shoot ' um good!!"


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:17 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.