Crossbows This is the place to discuss hunting with crossbows and crossbow equipment. This is NOT a crossbow debate forum.

Non-mechanical broadhead replacement?

Old 02-22-2008 | 10:38 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Default Non-mechanical broadhead replacement?

I am shooting a Ten Point Titan XL with a 3-blade, Spitfire 125 expandable broad heads. I need to find a suitable, non-mechanical broadhead replacement to qualify for a specific archery program. I am seeking the similar placement and flight performance. I don’t what to re-sight as I plan to use my mechanicals in the field. Any recommendations for a suitable substitute? Thanks.
vadeer is offline  
Reply
Old 02-22-2008 | 11:25 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
From: N46° 27.914' W90° 10.614'
Default RE: Non-mechanical broadhead replacement?

I don't think you will get exactly the same flight pattern nor shooting to the same P.O.A. with other BH's You will have to experiment with different 3Blade 125gr BH's. Start with a Muzzy 3blade 125 gr and go from there. Hopefully you have access to friends who use different BH's so you can try some.
DaGriz is offline  
Reply
Old 02-22-2008 | 12:49 PM
  #3  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,571
Likes: 0
From: Kansas city, Missouri
Default RE: Non-mechanical broadhead replacement?

The magnus stinger or the montec are very accurate broadheads. . . But i don't think you will find a fixed blade that hits where your expandables do
Steven McBee is offline  
Reply
Old 02-22-2008 | 12:51 PM
  #4  
Dnk's Avatar
Dnk
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,896
Likes: 0
From: Newtonville, Ontario, Canada
Default RE: Non-mechanical broadhead replacement?

Slick Tricks, G5 Strikers and Montecs, Magnus Stinger.
Dnk is offline  
Reply
Old 02-22-2008 | 01:45 PM
  #5  
Cossack's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
From: No.MN
Default RE: Non-mechanical broadhead replacement?

Slick Trick magnums have given me excellent flight consistency from arrow to arrow, as well as great terminal performance. They are relatively small, 1.25" wide, the 100 grnrs only an inch long, so likely to be loser in size to the mechanicals you're used to than larger BHs. Their 4 blades give them superior cutting action as well as flight characteristics.
Cossack is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Geronimo
Bowhunting
0
03-29-2009 07:27 AM
hoyt919
Bowhunting Gear Review
4
09-06-2007 08:22 AM
Stone316_74
Bowhunting
21
02-11-2005 04:41 PM
Shootem up870
Bowhunting
18
11-15-2004 10:49 PM
Turkey Blaster
Bowhunting Gear Review
15
12-31-2003 07:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.