HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Bowhunting (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/bowhunting-18/)
-   -   feathers vs. Vanes, need facts, not opinions (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/bowhunting/70109-feathers-vs-vanes-need-facts-not-opinions.html)

supaarcher 08-24-2004 08:22 AM

feathers vs. Vanes, need facts, not opinions
 
I have been getting into doing my own arrow work and bow work this year so I am learning alot. I always used to use feathers but got sick of them tearing apart and getting wet and looking busted up. Now i shoot vanes

What I would like to know is,

1. Is one faster thatn the other?
2. Is one less accurate than the other?
3. I bought arizona EZ-fletch, it applies the fletchings straight (or 1 degree) Is there a disadvantage to straight fletchings?
4. Is the weight difference between vanes and feathers anything to be concerned about?
5. What color fletchings fly the fastes? ;)

(BTW, I shoot Carbons)

Thanks!

supaarcher 08-24-2004 08:26 AM

RE: feathers vs. Vanes, need facts, not opinions
 
also, I know some people either dip the last 5 or 6 inches of there arrow, or use those white wraps. What do you think about this. What do you dip them in if you do that. And do you think wrapping adds way too much weight?

mobow 08-24-2004 08:40 AM

RE: feathers vs. Vanes, need facts, not opinions
 
1. Yes, feathers are faster because they are lighter, but only out to about 60 yards, then the vanes take over because of less wind drag.
2. Feathers may be more accurate for broadheads because they disrupt more air causing better stability.
3. The only thing straight vs. helical is spin. The more helical, the more spin.
4. Feathers are lighter, so it depends on your total arrow weight weather it will be an issue or not.
5. Color makes no difference as it relates to speed.
6. Wraps do add weight back to your arrow, but I think it is about 12 gr.

The big disadvantage of feathers is that they don't like to be wet, so waterproof them.

Hope this helps! Good luck this year.;)

Rob/PA Bowyer 08-24-2004 08:56 AM

RE: feathers vs. Vanes, need facts, not opinions
 
1. I disagree slightly with Mob....yes feathers can technically be called faster......but you'll never see the difference out of the bow and down range feathers will slow an arrow much quicker due to wind drag. Will you see a difference in arrow performance...no in the fractions of seconds that arrows are measured, fps...it's really a mute point as which is faster.

2. Accuracy...no neither is more accurate....to a point, again. Both feathers and vanes can be dead on accurate with tuning...so if both can hit dead on...it's really a matter of acher accuracy rather than equipment. That being said, feathers do have more air drag and will stabilize an arrow quicker.... which in turn makes tuning broadheads easier. The sooner you get an arrow spinning out of a bow, the quicker it will stabilize flight.

3.Straight vs helical/or offset. Again, see the rule above. The quicker you get an arrow spinning out of a bow, the sooner it will stabilize. Helical helps the arrow to spin sooner out of the bow which in turn will stabilize flaws in arrow flight such as broadhead misallignment, larger fixed blades with may fight the fletch and try to steer the arrow. Offset as well will stabilze an arrow quicker.

4. The weight difference is marginal and it comes into play only when marginal FOC calculations occur. If your having arrow flight problems and all else is equal, well tuned bow, arrow to match...FOC might be an issue.

5. Color makes no difference as it relates to speed. BUT, I do recommend bright fletch for varies reason...to watch arrow flight and recognize flaws, to see the arrow in the animal to mark the wound sight(important in recover timing), to see the arrow on the ground afterward. (again, animal recovery).

The biggest factor in feathers vs vanes are durability and noise. Feathers can be noisier and of course the durability in them coming apart and weather issues.

I prefer vanes after many seasons of feather usage. I used feathers for tuning flaws but today with matched equipment and technology I eliminate those tuning flaws and use vanes for durability.

supaarcher 08-24-2004 09:41 AM

RE: feathers vs. Vanes, need facts, not opinions
 
thanks for the responses guys. And I hope you know I was kidding with the color question. Color obviously makes no difference :D

Do you think I am making a mistake putting my fletchings straight? Should I be using a helical pattern? I can't do that with the EZ fletch and thats a handy tool.

Also, I understand the helical stuff, but what exactly is offset? Is that the distance from the knock? What is the correct distance?

Thanks a ton!

Arthur P 08-24-2004 09:50 AM

RE: feathers vs. Vanes, need facts, not opinions
 
One vane weighs more than three feathers of the same length and size. The difference can be substantial. Once past 60 yards, they say vanes are faster than arrows. Frankly, that's at least twice as far as I'll ever take a hunting shot, so that's a moot point. Over typical HUNTING distances, a feather fletched arrow IS faster by a few fps. Whether or not a few fps is that important is your decision to make.

Actually, I've found feathers to be FAR more durable than vanes. I fletched up a half dozen arrows with vanes two weeks ago. The feathers I pulled off before refletching had been on these same shafts for two YEARS. They were still shooting fine, but beginning to look a little ratty. Anyway, half of these freshly vane-fletched arrows already need to be refletched because the vanes have been cut or had holes shot in them from other arrows. Those same shots that ruined these vanes would have just ruffled feather fletches. Feathers get ruffled and you just smooth them back into shape. Vanes get destroyed.

Noise: If you put too much helical on feathers, they will hiss. Even at that, once they've been shot a bit and broken in - lost some of their stiffness, in other words - they're MUCH quieter. On the other hand, vanes can be noisy too, especially if they get wrinkled. Some of them flap like flags in the wind, making a healthy bit of noise. Vanes that are torn or have come loose sound like buzzbaits going thru the air. Vanes with holes in 'em whistle like a tea kettle.

Feathers do stabilize arrows quicker out of the bow. They also fold down as they pass an obstruction, and spring out after passing it. That means feathers are less likely to deflect if they accidently contact your arrow rest on the shot, or brush a stick on the way to the target. So, feathers are easier to tune and, where fletching contact can make a vane fletched arrow go nuts, the feather fletched arrow will stay pretty much on course.

Vanes are waterproof, but feathers can be treated with water repellent products.

The ONLY advantage vanes have over feathers is purchase price. The better quality vanes are half as expensive as feathers. However, COST is not the same as purchase price. When I can use feather fletches for two years and only get two weeks from a set of vanes.... That means, over time, vanes cost me 26 times as much as feathers do.

Think about it.;)

Check out this webpage. It's from Trueflight Feathers, so you know up front it's got a pro feathers slant but, honestly, I can't find a whole lot on this page to disagree with.

www.trueflightfeathers.com/facts.htm

Paul L Mohr 08-24-2004 10:16 AM

RE: feathers vs. Vanes, need facts, not opinions
 
Bottom line is feathers are lighter than vanes. About 15 to 20 grn if you have 4 inch feathers vrs 4 inch vanes. That is where the extra speed comes from. And like said above vanes begin to take over feathers at around 50 or 60 yards because the plastic vanes have less resistance to air.

Feathers will increase your foc compared to vanes, because there is less weight on the back of the arrow

Feathers stabilize the arrow faster because they have more resistance to air

Feathers make more noise than vanes that are in good shape.

Feathers are more forgiving than vanes. Vanes are great until one gets damamged. Then they makes noise as well, and can also screw up arrow flight. Feathers can be really messed up and you will still get good arrow flight out of them.

Feathers are better with contact issues on the rest or riser.

Vanes are better if you hunt when it's nasty out.

Feathers generally cost more than vanes.

I think feathers come in more colors, I could be wrong about that though. I know they are brighter for the most part.

Is one more accurate than the other? Accuracy is a subjective thing, it depends on how well you tune your bow, or your arrow configuration. Some people can tune a bow well enough they don't even need fletching. Feathers are however a bit more forgiving in this department because they stabilize the arrow faster and have more drag. Probably not much better than vanes really. Especially if you have some sort of offset or helical to your fletching.

As far as fletching them straight goes. Most feathers have some natural curvature to them, even when fletched straight. So they would impart a slight amount of spin to the arrow any way. Plus they have more drag to begin with. Many people shoot straight vanes however with great results. It's all about the tuning in the end.

I have used both and can't really say one works better than the other. I just use feathers because I like the way they look and they take more abuse. I shoot a lot and you can really mess feathers up before having to re-fletch arrows. I don't particularly like fletching arrows. Heck I even have a couple with one feather missing, they still group pretty well with target points on.

I have a tip for you with your Easy fletch though. If you fletch one feather or vane at a time you can put the arm any where you want it. So you can put some offset into it if you want. Instead of putting the concave part on the shaft, just push it over a bit to the edge. Just make sure you do them all the same way. Oh, and you have to use some sort of fast setting glue like super glue or something. Hold it for 15 or 20 seconds and then do another feather or vane. I do all my fletches one at a time. I think it's more consistant that way. I don't care much for the arizona easy fletcher myself.

Good luck,
Paul

Paul L Mohr 08-24-2004 10:19 AM

RE: feathers vs. Vanes, need facts, not opinions
 
I posted the same time as Arthur, sorry. Pretty much said the same thing but in different order.

Paul

Rack-attack 08-24-2004 10:27 AM

RE: feathers vs. Vanes, need facts, not opinions
 

Actually, I've found feathers to be FAR more durable than vanes.
I agree 100%........

One hole or rip in a vane and its done. Pull out half a feather and it still flies great.

Give me those ratty feathers any day:D

Rob/PA Bowyer 08-24-2004 10:33 AM

RE: feathers vs. Vanes, need facts, not opinions
 


One hole or rip in a vane and its done. Pull out half a feather and it still flies great.

I disagree. When I shoot for groups, I'm tearing and putting holes in my vanes and they still group/fly with the rest. I've even continued to use a ripped vaned arrow in a tournament because it was the one that day...and without incident as far as accuracy.....I watched a guy win a 3D shoot with an arrow with only 2 vanes remaining. It's about the tuning....not the fletch and I'll take a vane over a feather everyday.

10-a-c-huntr 08-24-2004 10:34 AM

RE: feathers vs. Vanes, need facts, not opinions
 
supraarcher

Ijust switched back to feathers a couple of mounths ago. I shoot fingers and the feathers stablize the arrow better,not as much of a problem if you are shooting a realease. They seemed to slow the arrows down compared to vanes for me. The ones I am using now are
offset which means that the rear of the feather is off center from the arrow by a small amount. Ialso have some old left helicals I shoot and I think I like them best.

Hope this helps good luck

Jason N 08-24-2004 11:30 AM

RE: feathers vs. Vanes, need facts, not opinions
 
I'm a bowhunter, not a target archer. I want the most stabilizing and forgiving fletching I can use. Feathers fit the bill. When you're contorted around a tree and shooting at odd angles a forgiving setup can mean a whole lot.....feathers are without a doubt more forgiving.....I use a powder on my feathers before the season starts and then about once every two weeks thereafter. I've hunted in heavy rain and never had a feather lay down.

EDIT: Feathers are much prettier on an arrow too....they make an arrow look like a tool instead of a toy!:D

c903 08-24-2004 05:40 PM

RE: feathers vs. Vanes, need facts, not opinions
 
During a conversation with a 76-year old archer, a previous record setter in flight shooting and a former 295 indoor shooter, we happen to discuss feathers vs. vanes. He said (paraphrased):

If vanes are better than feathers, why do 9 out of 10 of the top shooters at Vegas have every trick piece of gear on their bows but still shoot feathers?"

DannyinGeorgia 08-24-2004 06:37 PM

RE: feathers vs. Vanes, need facts, not opinions
 
Like Rob said, Feathers are louder than vanes.
Go down range and stand behind a tree while a buddy shoots both. You will make up your mind real fast that the dominating factor is NOISE!
If you don't think noise matters. 'Slow mode' a shot at a deer on a taped hunt and notice how much a deer will drop when he hears the shot.

Luckybuck 08-24-2004 09:41 PM

RE: feathers vs. Vanes, need facts, not opinions
 
What type of rest makes a difference, if using a wisker biscuit go with feathers if practicing alot, vanes tend to get wavy. But that is just my humble opinion.

Arthur P 08-25-2004 06:30 AM

RE: feathers vs. Vanes, need facts, not opinions
 
As I said before, feathers make more or less noise, depending on how much helical/offset they are fletched with and how new they are. That's not to even mention what cut they've got (to my ear, banana cut is louder than shield; shield is louder than parabolic), whether they're high profile or low profile, or how long they are! The longer and higher profile the feather, the more surface area it's got. The more surface area, the greater the stabilizing quality, but also the greater air disruption. The greater the air disruption, the greater the noise.

The guys who swear feathers are louder than vanes never seem to get around to specifically talking about exact condition, size, cut and profile of the feathers they've used in their 'tests'. Also - and no offense meant to anyone, just stating a fact - someone with a prejudice can hear exactly what he wants to hear. When you 'know' feathers are going to be louder, then your ears will wind up telling you that feathers are louder, no matter what the readings on a decibel meter might say.

Besides, standing off to the side and listening to the arrow come down the range is poor scientific method. The only way to know exactly what a deer hears at the shot is to be station yourself directly in front of the arrow in flight. Personally, I think I'll allow someone else to conduct THAT experiment.[:-];)

shishkabob 08-25-2004 07:09 AM

RE: feathers vs. Vanes, need facts, not opinions
 
Gotta go with rob on this one.Although to each his own.Some of my vanes look pretty bad and we shoot out to around 55 yds. on some targets at our club,
i still shoot good with those crappy vanes. HOwever i do refletch them every now and then,just so i dont look too out of place.

c903 08-25-2004 08:50 AM

RE: feathers vs. Vanes, need facts, not opinions
 
Ditto on Arthur's comments. I use straight and offset feathers and my shafts are silent in flight. This weekend while shooting in, my hunting bud was shooting carbon shafts ([X(]) with straight fletch and his shafts were whisper quiet.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:17 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.