To each his own I guess.

To each his own is correct until he is dead. My fantasy scoring of him came to ~ 141". Good buck for sure. If he walked within range, I'd be doing all I could to put a tape measure on him to end the theorizing.

heres a buck I shot in 2000. I had him scored at 142 gross 139 net. The 11 pt buck posted here has more mass and his g-4's are longer and he has a g-5. I still say gross is 150's.

11 scorable points. Decent height. He's not a bruiser but the fact you get to add 7 vertical point scores in there, he'll get to 140" easily.

Without question he's over 125" easily. Easily.

Ok my brother got him on video the other morning so lets see if any one says 130 any more and shows how bad people are at judging deer. This is his facebook page scroll down to the video.
https://m.facebook.com/kale.mccubbins?__user=107900787

@mgreen81, why do you ask peoples opinions then bash them saying they are bad at judging deer. I don't know why your panties are in a bunch. You asked our opinion, we gave it to you. Heck, you may never even know what he scores, and it don't matter what he scores till there is actual tape on him.

Because when I am not bad at judging deer and I get told a ridiculous score it eats on me a bit I'm just saying he is bigger than 130 I didnt bash anyone because I said no ones name. And did the link to the page with the video work. Also when I posted that I wanted people to see the differnce a trail cam makes compared to a video camera.

I'm curious as to what you guys think this one would score?

OK, he might go 135". That's all I'll budge.

No way he is 150"...not a chance.

Mid to upper 30's at the very most.