i'd say a 3 year old... and i was thinking 115-120... i could be wrong though, he looks too short to get much higher than 120

I love the Cuddeback. I have never had any issues with blank pics or battery life. I think the next one will be a regular capture instead of the capture IR. I like to see color on my night photos.

3 year old, 115 to 125". I wouldn't let him walk!

always tough to tell through a pic...but I'm gonna say 110-115. Not real wide and he's got some shorter tines out there that will hurt him too. I'd prob be shooting too, but if he lives another year or so, the mass will stack on and those short tines won't be so short anymore. Proper food sources and he'll score 140+ next year but thats a call that every hunter has to make for himself. Good luck chasing him.

120's, defiantly no where near 140's.

I agree, closer to the 115" range.

Nice looking buck for sure. I agree, mid 120's or so. It looks like it has a split brow tine on the right side, it looks like it anyway.

I would say that that deer would be 110-115. Alot of people overestimate deer and especially when they're in velvet.

115" is a stretch.....That is probably a 2 1/2 year old deer.

I think he will gross P&Y, probably wont net. But a great bow kill none the less! I would have to say he is 3.5 due to the width at which his neck attaches to the body, well defined brisket and muscle definition.