Broadhead comparison
07-27-2009 | 01:50 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Fork Horn
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
Broadhead comparison
Accidentally, ran into this "study" comparing the penetration of different types of broadheads. The "study" appears to be pretty good without any noticable bias.
Link is below.
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgu...%3D2%26hl%3Den
Link is below.
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgu...%3D2%26hl%3Den
07-27-2009 | 02:06 PM
#2
Dominant Buck
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 21,043
Likes: 0
From:
I've come to build my own opinion on BH's and their effectiveness. I think it boils down to these things in the order of importance:
1. Shot placement.
2. SHARPNESS OF BH
3. Properly tuned bow/arrow.
4. Adequate energy.
1. Shot placement.
2. SHARPNESS OF BH
3. Properly tuned bow/arrow.
4. Adequate energy.
07-28-2009 | 08:18 PM
#3
Spike
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Rapid City, South Dakota
I will never trust expandable bh again. I have tried two different ones with bad results. They did manage to kill the deer but did not pass all the way through and that isnt good for tracking. I've used 100 g muzzys for the last 7 years and they have passed through every time. They work great and the deer sure dont like them.
