MATHEWS MONSTER
#21
RE: MATHEWS MONSTER
Ofcourse it looks the same they both have PRELOADED LIMBS. Thats why they look the same. Bow companies can only do so much, I dont think its that they copy one another as much as it is they can only do so much. Does the X-force have AVS technology? No, oh then it isnt a "copy."
#23
RE: MATHEWS MONSTER
ORIGINAL: Vabowman
can I not have an opinion? Im not bashing any company..Im just calling it as i see it...I may be wrong, but it just looks very simillar.
can I not have an opinion? Im not bashing any company..Im just calling it as i see it...I may be wrong, but it just looks very simillar.
#24
RE: MATHEWS MONSTER
All you guys ranking on Mathews need to get a grip- I suppose you don't remember this entirely original creation from Pete Shepley Enterprises back in 1999 or so (along with the "absolutely not a blatant copy of the Mathews ultramax" PSE Carerra). Or the PSE tazman which was a direct rip of the MArtin Rage.
#25
RE: MATHEWS MONSTER
never bashed any company...Ny, I was catching heat for just saying it looked like a rip off of the X force...this is petty dude, I don't care that they did it, just made the statement that they did.
#26
RE: MATHEWS MONSTER
First it does "look" like the x-force. The cam system is completely differnent in the way it functions.
Most speed bows look like each other. To achieve those speeds takes a similar desigin.
Mathews did not invent the solocam, Martin did I beleive. Just like Bowtech did not invent Binary cam, Darton did Elite thinks they invented everything and then they get sued[8D]
Most speed bows look like each other. To achieve those speeds takes a similar desigin.
Mathews did not invent the solocam, Martin did I beleive. Just like Bowtech did not invent Binary cam, Darton did Elite thinks they invented everything and then they get sued[8D]
#27
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 13
RE: MATHEWS MONSTER
hey guys im laughing right now at everyone saying its a pse x force...its the other way around!! McPherson sold the rights to the design to pse and made a ton of money off of it, now he's releasing the design into his Mathews line obviously tweaking it to make it better than the pse version, so in conclusion Matt McPherson is a loaded genius
#28
RE: MATHEWS MONSTER
ORIGINAL: Vabowman
never bashed any company...Ny, I was catching heat for just saying it looked like a rip off of the X force...this is petty dude, I don't care that they did it, just made the statement that they did.
never bashed any company...Ny, I was catching heat for just saying it looked like a rip off of the X force...this is petty dude, I don't care that they did it, just made the statement that they did.
#29
RE: MATHEWS MONSTER
ORIGINAL: DuncanVa
hey guys im laughing right now at everyone saying its a pse x force...its the other way around!! McPherson sold the rights to the design to pse and made a ton of money off of it, now he's releasing the design into his Mathews line obviously tweaking it to make it better than the pse version, so in conclusion Matt McPherson is a loaded genius
hey guys im laughing right now at everyone saying its a pse x force...its the other way around!! McPherson sold the rights to the design to pse and made a ton of money off of it, now he's releasing the design into his Mathews line obviously tweaking it to make it better than the pse version, so in conclusion Matt McPherson is a loaded genius
#30
RE: MATHEWS MONSTER
ORIGINAL: Vabowman
never bashed any company...Ny, I was catching heat for just saying it looked like a rip off of the X force...this is petty dude, I don't care that they did it, just made the statement that they did.
never bashed any company...Ny, I was catching heat for just saying it looked like a rip off of the X force...this is petty dude, I don't care that they did it, just made the statement that they did.